Cross-Modal Redundancy and the Geometry of Vision-Language Embeddings
Grégoire Dhimoïla, Thomas Fel, Victor Boutin, Agustin M. Picard
Abstract
Vision–language models (VLMs) align images and text with remarkable success, yet the geometry of their shared embedding space remains poorly understood. To probe this geometry, we begin from the Iso-Energy Assumption, which exploits cross-modal redundancy: a concept that is truly shared should exhibit the same average energy across modalities. We operationalize this assumption with an Aligned Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) that encourages energy consistency during training while preserving reconstruction. We find that this inductive bias changes the SAE solution without harming reconstruction, giving us a representation that serves as a tool for geometric analysis. Sanity checks on controlled data with known ground truth confirm that alignment improves when Iso-Energy holds and remains neutral when it does not. Applied to foundational VLMs, our framework reveals a clear structure with practical consequences: (i) sparse bimodal atoms carry the entire cross-modal alignment signal; (ii) unimodal atoms act as modality-specific biases and fully explain the modality gap; (iii) removing unimodal atoms collapses the gap without harming performance; (iv) restricting vector arithmetic to the bimodal subspace yields in-distribution edits and improved retrieval. These findings suggest that the right inductive bias can both preserve model fidelity and render the latent geometry interpretable and actionable.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1fc9086a-b4b1-4eef-bd6c-97e26cb1254cBuilds on27
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation LearningWeixin Liang, Yuhui Zhang, Yongchan Kwon, Serena Yeung et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 834 citations
- Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest NeighborsYiyou Sun, Yifei Ming, Xiaojin Zhu, Yixuan LiICML 2022 · 789 citations
Related papers
- VL-SAE: Interpreting and Enhancing Vision-Language Alignment with a Unified Concept SetShufan Shen, Junshu Sun, Qingming Huang, Shuhui WangNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Mitigate the Gap: Improving Cross-Modal Alignment in CLIPSedigheh Eslami, Gerard de MeloICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- IsoCLIP: Decomposing CLIP Projectors for Efficient Intra-modal AlignmentSimone Magistri, Dipam Goswami, Marco Mistretta, Bartlomiej Twardowski et al.CVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- Interpretability Transfer from Language to Vision via Sparse AutoencodersAlexey Kravets, Da Li, Chuan Li, Da Chen et al.ICML 2026
- AlignVLM: Bridging Vision and Language Latent Spaces for Multimodal Document UnderstandingAhmed Masry, Juan A. Rodríguez, Tianyu Zhang, Suyuchen Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
