From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuit
Valérie Costa, Thomas Fel, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Bahareh Tolooshams, Demba Ba
Abstract
Motivated by the hypothesis that neural network representations encode abstract, interpretable features as linearly accessible, approximately orthogonal directions, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have become a popular tool in interpretability literature. However, recent work has demonstrated phenomenology of model representations that lies outside the scope of this hypothesis, showing signatures of hierarchical, nonlinear, and multi-dimensional features. This raises the question: do SAEs represent features that possess structure at odds with their motivating hypothesis? If not, does avoiding this mismatch help identify said features and gain further insights into neural network representations? To answer these questions, we take a construction-based approach and re-contextualize the popular matching pursuit (MP) algorithm from sparse coding to design MP-SAE-an SAE that unrolls its encoder into a sequence of residual-guided steps, allowing it to capture hierarchical and nonlinearly accessible features. Comparing this architecture with existing SAEs on a mixture of synthetic and natural data settings, we show: (i) hierarchical concepts induce conditionally orthogonal features, which existing SAEs are unable to faithfully capture, and (ii) the nonlinear encoding step of MP-SAE recovers highly meaningful features, helping us unravel shared structure in the seemingly dichotomous representation spaces of different modalities in a vision-language model, hence demonstrating the assumption that useful features are solely linearly accessible is insufficient. We also show that the sequential encoder principle of MP-SAE affords an additional benefit of adaptive sparsity at inference time, which may be of independent interest. Overall, we argue our results provide credence to the idea that interpretability should begin with the phenomenology of representations, with methods emerging from assumptions that fit it.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b36ece5e-beec-4517-b1a9-96fe8b9e2bd6Cited by top-tier papers8
- Into the Rabbit Hull: From Task-Relevant Concepts in DINO to Minkowski GeometryThomas Fel, Binxu Wang, Michael A. Lepori, Matthew Kowal et al.ICLR 2026 · 28 citations
- Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse AutoencodersAkshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei Weng, Vivek Narayanaswamy, Shusen Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- From Isolation to Entanglement: When Do Interpretability Methods Identify and Disentangle Known Concepts?Aaron Mueller, Andrew Lee, Shruti Joshi, Ekdeep Singh Lubana et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders are Topic ModelsLeander Girrbach, Zeynep AkataICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Towards Understanding Steering StrengthMagamed Taimeskhanov, Samuel Vaiter, Damien GarreauICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on42
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Scalable Diffusion Models with TransformersWilliam Peebles, Saining XieICCV 2023 · 5,568 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
Related papers
- Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse AutoencodersVladimir Zaigrajew, Hubert Baniecki, Przemyslaw BiecekICML 2025
- Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept GeometrySai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Demba BaNeurIPS 2025 · 65 citations
- Discovering and Steering Interpretable Concepts in Large Generative Music ModelsNikhil Singh, Manuel Cherep, Pattie MaesICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse AutoencodersCharles O'Neill, Alim Gumran, David A. KlindtICML 2025
- Priors in time: Missing inductive biases for language model interpretabilityEkdeep Singh Lubana, Can Rager, Sai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Valérie Costa et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
