Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders
Charles O'Neill, Alim Gumran, David A. Klindt
Abstract
A recent line of work has shown promise in using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to uncover interpretable features in neural network representations. However, the simple linear-nonlinear encoding mechanism in SAEs limits their ability to perform accurate sparse inference. Using compressed sensing theory, we prove that an SAE encoder is inherently insufficient for accurate sparse inference, even in solvable cases. We then decouple encoding and decoding processes to empirically explore conditions where more sophisticated sparse inference methods outperform traditional SAE encoders. Our results reveal substantial performance gains with minimal compute increases in correct inference of sparse codes. We demonstrate this generalises to SAEs applied to large language models, where more expressive encoders achieve greater interpretability. This work opens new avenues for understanding neural network representations and analysing large language model activations. Recent work has investigated the "superposition hypothe- Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 455fad6e-4ddc-4ea0-8c53-fa96545ae958Cited by top-tier papers5
- AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional FeaturesXudong Zhu, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Zhihui ZhuICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Brain-like Variational InferenceHadi Vafaii, Dekel Galor, Jacob L. YatesNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- The Price of Amortized inference in Sparse AutoencodersWenjie Sun, Di Wang, Lijie HuICLR 2026
- Towards Atoms of Large Language ModelsChenhui Hu, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu et al.ICML 2026
- Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in Sparse AutoencodersXiangchen Song, Aashiq Muhamed, Yujia Zheng, Lingjing Kong et al.ACL 2026
Builds on4
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
- The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Yibo Jiang, Victor VeitchICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and ControlAleksandar Makelov, Georg Lange, Neel NandaICLR 2025
Related papers
- On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted RemedyJingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse AutoencodersSenthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Tom Lieberum et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse ProbingSubhash Kantamneni, Joshua Engels, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Max Tegmark et al.ICML 2025
- From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching PursuitValérie Costa, Thomas Fel, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Bahareh Tolooshams et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 54 citations
- Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept GeometrySai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Demba BaNeurIPS 2025 · 65 citations
