Revising and Falsifying Sparse Autoencoder Feature Explanations
George Ma, Samuel Pfrommer, Somayeh Sojoudi
Abstract
Mechanistic interpretability research seeks to reverse-engineer large language models (LLMs) by uncovering the internal representations of concepts within their activations. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a valuable tool for disentangling polysemantic neurons into more monosemantic, interpretable features. However, recent work on automatic explanation generation for these features has faced challenges: explanations tend to be overly broad and fail to take polysemanticity into consideration. This work addresses these limitations by introducing a similarity-based strategy for sourcing close negative sentences that more effectively falsify generated explanations. Additionally, we propose a structured, component-based format for feature explanations and a tree-based, iterative explanation method that refines explanations. We demonstrate that our structured format and tree-based explainer improve explanation quality, while our similarity-based evaluation strategy exposes biases in existing interpretability methods. We also analyze the evolution of feature complexity and polysemanticity across LLM layers, offering new insights into information content within LLMs’ residual streams. Code is available at https://github.com/GeorgeMLP/feature-interp .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6c62cdc9-8a78-41a1-93b2-e7781ca6ee5fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs AutomaticallyAnay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis, Paul Kassianik, Blaine Nelson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 835 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam SearchReid Pryzant, Dan Iter, Jerry Li, Yin Tat Lee et al.EMNLP 2023 · 137 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Route Sparse Autoencoder to Interpret Large Language ModelsWei Shi, Sihang Li, Tao Liang, Mingyang Wan et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
- On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted RemedyJingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of AnalysisPatrick Leask, Bart Bussmann, Michael T. Pearce, Joseph Isaac Bloom et al.ICLR 2025
- Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for InterpretabilityUsha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Himabindu Lakkaraju et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
