Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree search
Fangzheng Sun, Yang Liu, Jian-Xun Wang, Hao Sun
Abstract
Nonlinear dynamics is ubiquitous in nature and commonly seen in various science and engineering disciplines. Distilling analytical expressions that govern nonlinear dynamics from limited data remains vital but challenging. To tackle this fundamental issue, we propose a novel Symbolic Physics Learner (SPL) machine to discover the mathematical structure of nonlinear dynamics. The key concept is to interpret mathematical operations and system state variables by computational rules and symbols, establish symbolic reasoning of mathematical formulas via expression trees, and employ a Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) agent to explore optimal expression trees based on measurement data. The MCTS agent obtains an optimistic selection policy through the traversal of expression trees, featuring the one that maps to the arithmetic expression of underlying physics. Salient features of the proposed framework include search flexibility and enforcement of parsimony for discovered equations. The efficacy and superiority of the SPL machine are demonstrated by numerical examples, compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f30b7ac0-86d9-4942-b6b3-3d7f854875dcCited by top-tier papers26
- Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic RegressionParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani, Chandan K. ReddyNeurIPS 2023 · 116 citations
- Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-SearchPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Guillaume Lample, Sylvain Lamprier, Marco VirgolinICML 2023 · 50 citations
- Controllable Neural Symbolic RegressionTommaso Bendinelli, Luca Biggio, Pierre-Alexandre KamiennyICML 2023 · 22 citations
- Reinforcement Symbolic Regression MachineYilong Xu, Yang Liu, Hao SunICLR 2024 · 17 citations
- 3DAlign-DAER: Dynamic Attention Policy and Efficient Retrieval Strategy for Fine-grained 3D-Text Alignment at ScaleYijia Fan, Jusheng Zhang, Kaitong Cai, Jing Yang et al.AAAI 2026 · 12 citations
Builds on4
- Deep Learning For Symbolic MathematicsGuillaume Lample, François ChartonICLR 2020 · 477 citations
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitySilviu-Marian Udrescu, Andrew K. Tan, Jiahai Feng, Orisvaldo Neto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 267 citations
- Discovering Nonlinear PDEs from Scarce Data with Physics-encoded LearningChengping Rao, Pu Ren, Yang Liu, Hao SunICLR 2022 · 36 citations
Related papers
- Graph-based Symbolic Regression with Invariance and Constraint EncodingZiyu Xiang, Kenna Ashen, Xiaofeng Qian, Xiaoning QianNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Discovering Ordinary Differential Equations with LLM-Based Qualitative and Quantitative EvaluationSum Kyun Song, Bong Gyun Shin, JaeYong LeeICML 2026
- Learning Symbolic Models for Graph-structured Physical MechanismHongzhi Shi, Jingtao Ding, Yufan Cao, Quanming Yao et al.ICLR 2023
- Improving Monte Carlo Tree Search for Symbolic RegressionZhengyao Huang, Daniel Huang, Tiannan Xiao, Dina Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection BenchmarkMingquan Feng, Yixin Huang, Yizhou Liu, Bofang Jiang et al.ICLR 2025
