Graph-based Symbolic Regression with Invariance and Constraint Encoding
Ziyu Xiang, Kenna Ashen, Xiaofeng Qian, Xiaoning Qian
Abstract
Symbolic regression (SR) seeks interpretable analytical expressions that uncover the governing relationships within data, providing mechanistic insight beyond ‘black-box’ models. However, existing SR methods often suffer from two key limitations: (1) redundant representations that fail to capture mathematical equiv-alences and higher-order operand relations, breaking permutation invariance and hindering efficient learning; and (2) sparse rewards caused by incomplete incorporation of constraints that can only be evaluated on full expressions, such as constant fitting or physical-law verification. To address these challenges, we pro-pose a unified framework, Graph-based Symbolic Regression (GSR) , which compresses the search space through the permutation-invariant representations, expression graphs (EGs), that intrinsically encode expression equivalences via a term-rewriting system (TRS) and a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure. GSR mitigates reward sparsity by employing a hybrid neural-guided Monte Carlo tree search (hnMCTS) on EGs, where constraint-informed neural guidance enables the direct incorporation of expression-level constraint priors, and an adaptive ϵ -UCB policy balances exploration and exploitation. Theoretical analyses establish the uniqueness of our proposed EG representation and the convergence of the hnMCTS algorithm. Experiments on synthetic and real-world scientific datasets demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of GSR in discovering underlying expressions and adhering to physical laws, offering practical solutions for scientific discovery.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fe9217a1-059d-4eb7-abb5-d57cda3ca6ffCited by top-tier papers2
- Discovering Ordinary Differential Equations with LLM-Based Qualitative and Quantitative EvaluationSum Kyun Song, Bong Gyun Shin, JaeYong LeeICML 2026
- Neural–Evolutionary Symbolic Regression with Global Constraints: Constraint-Aware Decoding and Reward ShapingXiangdong Wu, wenjun wu, Ziyu Wei, Bingrun Chen et al.ICML 2026
Builds on8
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitySilviu-Marian Udrescu, Andrew K. Tan, Jiahai Feng, Orisvaldo Neto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 267 citations
- A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic RegressionMikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Jiachen Yang, Ruben Glatt et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 160 citations
- Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic RegressionParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani, Chandan K. ReddyNeurIPS 2023 · 116 citations
- Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming SeedingT. Nathan Mundhenk, Mikel Landajuela, Ruben Glatt, Cláudio P. Santiago et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 95 citations
Related papers
- EGG-SR: Embedding Symbolic Equivalence into Symbolic Regression via Equality GraphNan Jiang, Ziyi Wang, Yexiang XueICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Improving Monte Carlo Tree Search for Symbolic RegressionZhengyao Huang, Daniel Huang, Tiannan Xiao, Dina Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Reinforcement Symbolic Regression MachineYilong Xu, Yang Liu, Hao SunICLR 2024 · 17 citations
- Learning Symbolic Models for Graph-structured Physical MechanismHongzhi Shi, Jingtao Ding, Yufan Cao, Quanming Yao et al.ICLR 2023
- Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree searchFangzheng Sun, Yang Liu, Jian-Xun Wang, Hao SunICLR 2023 · 13 citations
