Discovering Ordinary Differential Equations with LLM-Based Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation
Sum Kyun Song, Bong Gyun Shin, JaeYong Lee
Abstract
Discovering governing differential equations from observational data is a fundamental challenge in scientific machine learning. Existing symbolic regression approaches rely primarily on quantitative metrics; however, real-world differential equation modeling also requires incorporating domain knowledge to ensure physical plausibility. To address this gap, we propose DoLQ, a method for discovering ordinary differential equations with LLM-based qualitative and quantitative evaluation. DoLQ employs a multi-agent architecture: a Sampler Agent proposes dynamic system candidates, a Parameter Optimizer refines equations for accuracy, and a Scientist Agent leverages an LLM to conduct both qualitative and quantitative evaluations and synthesize their results to iteratively guide the search. Experiments on multi-dimensional ordinary differential equation benchmarks demonstrate that DoLQ achieves superior performance compared to existing methods, not only attaining higher success rates but also more accurately recovering the correct symbolic terms of ground truth equations. Our code is available at https://github.com/Bon99yun/DoLQ.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2f77c086-aef3-44a5-9af7-39b6c1aadae9Builds on13
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic RegressionParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani, Chandan K. ReddyNeurIPS 2023 · 116 citations
- Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept LibraryArya Grayeli, Atharva Sehgal, Omar Costilla-Reyes, Miles D. Cranmer et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 105 citations
Related papers
- LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language ModelsParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Shashank Gupta, Amir Barati Farimani et al.ICLR 2025
- Deliberate Evolution: Agentic Reasoning for Sample-Efficient Symbolic Regression with LLMsXinyu Pang, (Andrew) Zhanke Zhou, Xuan Li, Fangrui Lv et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Reinforcement Symbolic Regression MachineYilong Xu, Yang Liu, Hao SunICLR 2024 · 17 citations
- A Probabilistic Framework for LLM-Based Model DiscoveryStefan Wahl, Raphaela Schenk, Ali Farnoud, Jakob Macke et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Influence-Guided Symbolic Regression: Scientific Discovery via LLM-Driven Equation Search with Granular FeedbackEvgeny S. Saveliev, Samuel Holt, Nabeel Seedat, David Bentley et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
