Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regression
Parshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani, Chandan K. Reddy
Abstract
Symbolic regression (SR) is a challenging task in machine learning that involves finding a mathematical expression for a function based on its values. Recent advancements in SR have demonstrated the effectiveness of pre-trained transformerbased models in generating equations as sequences, leveraging large-scale pretraining on synthetic datasets and offering notable advantages in terms of inference time over classical Genetic Programming (GP) methods. However, these models primarily rely on supervised pre-training goals borrowed from text generation and overlook equation discovery objectives like accuracy and complexity. To address this, we propose TPSR, a Transformer-based Planning strategy for Symbolic Regression that incorporates Monte Carlo Tree Search into the transformer decoding process. Unlike conventional decoding strategies, TPSR enables the integration of non-differentiable feedback, such as fitting accuracy and complexity, as external sources of knowledge into the transformer-based equation generation process. Extensive experiments on various datasets show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods, enhancing the model's fitting-complexity trade-off, extrapolation abilities, and robustness to noise 2 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7e697797-098e-4b36-b7b9-c546ecaec1c4Cited by top-tier papers21
- SNIP: Bridging Mathematical Symbolic and Numeric Realms with Unified Pre-trainingKazem Meidani, Parshin Shojaee, Chandan K. Reddy, Amir Barati FarimaniICLR 2024 · 37 citations
- Improving Monte Carlo Tree Search for Symbolic RegressionZhengyao Huang, Daniel Huang, Tiannan Xiao, Dina Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- GenSR: Symbolic regression based on equation generative spaceQian Li, Yuxiao Hu, Juncheng Liu, Yuntian ChenICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Graph-based Symbolic Regression with Invariance and Constraint EncodingZiyu Xiang, Kenna Ashen, Xiaofeng Qian, Xiaoning QianNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Modeling Latent Non-Linear Dynamical System over Time SeriesRen Fujiwara, Yasuko Matsubara, Yasushi SakuraiAAAI 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq R. Joty, Steven C. H. HoiEMNLP 2021 · 1,224 citations
- Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive BiasesMiles D. Cranmer, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. Battaglia, Rui Xu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 736 citations
- Deep Learning For Symbolic MathematicsGuillaume Lample, François ChartonICLR 2020 · 477 citations
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
Related papers
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-SearchPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Guillaume Lample, Sylvain Lamprier, Marco VirgolinICML 2023 · 50 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- Transformer-based model for symbolic regression via joint supervised learningWenqiang Li, Weijun Li, Linjun Sun, Min Wu et al.ICLR 2023
- Deep Generative Symbolic RegressionSamuel Holt, Zhaozhi Qian, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2023 · 4 citations
