Deep Generative Symbolic Regression
Samuel Holt, Zhaozhi Qian, Mihaela van der Schaar
Abstract
Symbolic regression (SR) aims to discover concise closed-form mathematical equations from data, a task fundamental to scientific discovery. However, the problem is highly challenging because closed-form equations lie in a complex combinatorial search space. Existing methods, ranging from heuristic search to reinforcement learning, fail to scale with the number of input variables. We make the observation that closed-form equations often have structural characteristics and invariances (e.g., the commutative law) that could be further exploited to build more effective symbolic regression solutions. Motivated by this observation, our key contribution is to leverage pre-trained deep generative models to capture the intrinsic regularities of equations, thereby providing a solid foundation for subsequent optimization steps. We show that our novel formalism unifies several prominent approaches of symbolic regression and offers a new perspective to justify and improve on the previous ad hoc designs, such as the usage of cross-entropy loss during pre-training. Specifically, we propose an instantiation of our framework, Deep Generative Symbolic Regression (DGSR). In our experiments, we show that DGSR achieves a higher recovery rate of true equations in the setting of a larger number of input variables, and it is more computationally efficient at inference time than state-of-the-art RL symbolic regression solutions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 498b82e0-e913-447f-b6e6-6700c3b6e1c4Cited by top-tier papers24
- Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic RegressionParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani, Chandan K. ReddyNeurIPS 2023 · 116 citations
- Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language ModelsChris Lu, Samuel Holt, Claudio Fanconi, Alex J. Chan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 41 citations
- SNIP: Bridging Mathematical Symbolic and Numeric Realms with Unified Pre-trainingKazem Meidani, Parshin Shojaee, Chandan K. Reddy, Amir Barati FarimaniICLR 2024 · 37 citations
- Automatically Learning Hybrid Digital Twins of Dynamical SystemsSamuel Holt, Tennison Liu, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- Reinforcement Symbolic Regression MachineYilong Xu, Yang Liu, Hao SunICLR 2024 · 17 citations
Builds on9
- Deep Learning For Symbolic MathematicsGuillaume Lample, François ChartonICLR 2020 · 477 citations
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- Reinforcement Learning for Integer Programming: Learning to CutYunhao Tang, Shipra Agrawal, Yuri FaenzaICML 2020 · 224 citations
Related papers
- EGG-SR: Embedding Symbolic Equivalence into Symbolic Regression via Equality GraphNan Jiang, Ziyi Wang, Yexiang XueICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Rethinking Symbolic Regression: Morphology and Adaptability in the Context of Evolutionary AlgorithmsKei Sen Fong, Shelvia Wongso, Mehul MotaniICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- A Neural-Guided Dynamic Symbolic Network for Exploring Mathematical Expressions from DataWenqiang Li, Weijun Li, Lina Yu, Min Wu et al.ICML 2024 · 16 citations
- LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language ModelsParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Shashank Gupta, Amir Barati Farimani et al.ICLR 2025
- ParFam - (Neural Guided) Symbolic Regression via Continuous Global OptimizationPhilipp Scholl, Katharina Bieker, Hillary Hauger, Gitta KutyniokICLR 2025 · 1 citation
