Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Models
Chris Lu, Samuel Holt, Claudio Fanconi, Alex J. Chan, Jakob N. Foerster, Mihaela van der Schaar, Robert T. Lange
Abstract
Offline preference optimization is a key method for enhancing and controlling the quality of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs. Typically, preference optimization is approached as an offline supervised learning task using manually-crafted convex loss functions. While these methods are based on theoretical insights, they are inherently constrained by human creativity, so the large search space of possible loss functions remains under explored. We address this by performing LLM-driven objective discovery to automatically discover new state-of-the-art preference optimization algorithms without (expert) human intervention. Specifically, we iteratively prompt an LLM to propose and implement new preference optimization loss functions based on previously-evaluated performance metrics. This process leads to the discovery of previously-unknown and performant preference optimization algorithms. The best performing of these we call Discovered Preference Optimization (DiscoPOP), a novel algorithm that adaptively blends logistic and exponential losses. Experiments demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of DiscoPOP and its successful transfer to held-out tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0610563d-bb77-41e4-8724-f77c81cdc59dCited by top-tier papers14
- ShinkaEvolve: Towards Open-Ended and Sample-Efficient Program EvolutionRobert T. Lange, Yuki Imajuku, Edoardo CetinICLR 2026 · 162 citations
- AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-benchEdan Toledo, Karen Hambardzumyan, Martin Josifoski, Rishi Hazra et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 71 citations
- Towards Execution-Grounded Automated AI ResearchChenglei Si, Zitong Yang, Yejin Choi, Emmanuel J Candes et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
- InfiGFusion: Graph-on-Logits Distillation via Efficient Gromov-Wasserstein for Model FusionYuanyi Wang, Zhaoyi Yan, Yiming Zhang, Qi Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Meta-Learning Objectives for Preference OptimizationCarlo Alfano, Silvia Sapora, Jakob N. Foerster, Patrick Rebeschini et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on35
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
Related papers
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- Pareto Prompt OptimizationGuang Zhao, Byung-Jun Yoon, Gilchan Park, Shantenu Jha et al.ICLR 2025
- PRompt Optimization in Multi-Step Tasks (PROMST): Integrating Human Feedback and Heuristic-based SamplingYongchao Chen, Jacob Arkin, Yilun Hao, Yang Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- MallowsPO: Fine-Tune Your LLM with Preference DispersionsHaoxian Chen, Hanyang Zhao, Henry Lam, David D. Yao et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
