ACL Findings2025
AMoPO: Adaptive Multi-objective Preference Optimization without Reward Models and Reference Models
Qi Liu, Jingqing Ruan, Hao Li, Haodong Zhao, Desheng Wang, Jiansong Chen, Guanglu Wan, Xunliang Cai, Zhi Zheng, Tong Xu
Abstract
Existing multi-objective preference alignment methods for large language models (LLMs) face limitations: (1) the inability to effectively balance various preference dimensions, and (2) reliance on auxiliary reward/reference models introduces computational complexity. To address these challenges, we propose Adaptive Multi-objective Preference Optimization (AMoPO), a novel framework that achieves dynamic balance across preference dimensions. By introducing the multi-objective optimization paradigm to use the dimension-aware generation metrics as implicit rewards, AMoPO aligns LLMs with diverse preferences without additional reward models or reference models. We introduce an adaptive weight assignment mechanism that models the generation space as a Gaussian distribution, allowing dynamic prioritization of preference dimensions. Empirical results demonstrate that AMoPO outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 28.5%, and the experiments on 7B, 14B, and 32B models reveal the scaling ability of AMoPO. Moreover, additional analysis of multiple dimensions verifies its adaptability and effectiveness. These findings validate AMoPO's capability to achieve dimension-aware preference alignment, highlighting its superiority. Our codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/Javkonline/AMoPO.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Reward-free Alignment for Conflicting ObjectivesPeter Chen, Xiaopeng Li, Xi Chen, Tianyi LinICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Self-Guided Alignment: Adaptive Preference Sensing for Multi-Objective GenerationNing Wang, Zhanyang Liu, Taotao Zhou, Xinrui Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- SGN: Shifted Window-Based Hierarchical Variable Grouping for Multivariate Time Series ClassificationZenan Ying, Zhi Zheng, Huijun Hou, Tong Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Expert-Inspired Multi-Agent Coordination for Multi-Objective Molecular OptimizationDaojian Zeng, Tianle Li, Jiahao Yang, Jiacai Yi et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on18
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
Related papers
- AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.ICML 2025
- Adversarial Preference Optimization: Enhancing Your Alignment via RM-LLM GamePengyu Cheng, Yifan Yang, Jian Li, Yong Dai et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 6 citations
- Creative Preference OptimizationMete Ismayilzada, Antonio Laverghetta Jr., Simone Luchini, Reet Patel et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
- RMO: Towards Better LLM Alignment via Reshaping Reward Margin DistributionsYanchi Ru, Yue Huang, Xiangliang ZhangAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay PerspectiveRuichen Shao, Bei Li, Gangao Liu, Yang Chen et al.ICLR 2025
