ACL Findings2024
Adversarial Preference Optimization: Enhancing Your Alignment via RM-LLM Game
Pengyu Cheng, Yifan Yang, Jian Li, Yong Dai, Tianhao Hu, Peixin Cao, Nan Du, Xiaolong Li
Abstract
Human preference alignment is essential to improve the interaction quality of large language models (LLMs). Existing alignment methods depend on manually annotated preference data to guide the LLM optimization directions. However, continuously updating LLMs for alignment raises a distribution gap between model-generated samples and humanannotated responses, hindering training effectiveness. To mitigate this issue, previous methods require additional preference annotation on newly generated samples to adapt to the shifted distribution, which consumes a large amount of annotation resources. Targeting more efficient human preference optimization, we propose an Adversarial Preference Optimization (APO) framework, in which the LLM and the reward model update alternatively via a minmax game. Through adversarial training, the reward model can adapt to the shifted generation distribution of the LLM without any additional annotation. With comprehensive experiments, we find the proposed adversarial training framework further enhances existing alignment baselines in terms of LLM helpfulness and harmlessness. The code is at https://github.com/Linear95/APO.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 13 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers13
- Search Self-Play: Pushing the Frontier of Agent Capability without SupervisionHongliang Lu, Yuhang Wen, Pengyu Cheng, Ruijin Ding et al.ICLR 2026 · 35 citations
- RSafe: Incentivizing proactive reasoning to build robust and adaptive LLM safeguardsJingnan Zheng, Xiangtian Ji, Yijun Lu, Chenhang Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Triplets Better Than Pairs: Towards Stable and Effective Self-Play Fine-Tuning for LLMsYibo Wang, Hai-Long Sun, Guangda Huzhang, Qingguo Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Eliminating Inductive Bias in Reward Models with Information-Theoretic GuidanceZhuo Li, Pengyu Cheng, Zhechao Yu, FeifeiTong et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- SPACE: Noise Contrastive Estimation Stabilizes Self-Play Fine-Tuning for Large Language ModelsYibo Wang, Guangda Huzhang, Qingguo Chen, Zhao Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human FeedbackHongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Chuanqi Tan, Wei Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 515 citations
- Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference OptimizationTianqi Liu, Yao Zhao, Rishabh Joshi, Misha Khalman et al.ICLR 2024 · 346 citations
Related papers
- Negating Negatives: Alignment with Human Negative Samples via Distributional Dispreference OptimizationShitong Duan, Xiaoyuan Yi, Peng Zhang, Yan Liu et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 2 citations
- AMoPO: Adaptive Multi-objective Preference Optimization without Reward Models and Reference ModelsQi Liu, Jingqing Ruan, Hao Li, Haodong Zhao et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 2 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference OptimizationJunming Yang, Ning Xu, Biao Liu, Shiqi Qiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- ActiveDPO: Active Direct Preference Optimization for Sample-Efficient AlignmentXiaoqiang Lin, Arun Verma, Zhongxiang Dai, Daniela Rus et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
