EMNLP Findings2025
Creative Preference Optimization
Mete Ismayilzada, Antonio Laverghetta Jr., Simone Luchini, Reet Patel, Antoine Bosselut, Lonneke van der Plas, Roger E. Beaty
Abstract
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across natural language generation tasks, their ability to generate truly creative content-characterized by novelty, diversity, surprise, and quality-remains limited. Existing methods for enhancing LLM creativity often focus narrowly on diversity or specific tasks, failing to address creativity's multifaceted nature in a generalizable way. In this work, we propose Creative Preference Optimization (CRPO), a novel alignment method that injects signals from multiple creativity dimensions into the preference optimization objective in a modular fashion. We train and evaluate creativity-augmented versions of several models using CRPO and MUCE, a new largescale human preference dataset spanning over 200,000 human-generated responses and ratings from more than 30 psychological creativity assessments. Our models outperform strong baselines, including GPT-4o, on both automated and human evaluations, producing more novel, diverse, and surprising generations while maintaining high output quality. Additional evaluations on NOVELTYBENCH further confirm the generalizability of our approach. Together, our results demonstrate that directly optimizing for creativity within preference frameworks is a promising direction for advancing the creative capabilities of LLMs without compromising output quality.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 2 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM DiversityJiayi Zhang, Simon Yu, Derek Chong, Anthony Sicilia et al.ICML 2026 · 102 citations
- Optimizing Diversity and Quality through Base-Aligned Model CollaborationYichen Wang, Chenghao Yang, Tenghao Huang, Muhao Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
Builds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- ZeRO: memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter modelsSamyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, Yuxiong HeSC 2020 · 852 citations
- DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding SharingPengcheng He, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2023 · 394 citations
Related papers
- AMoPO: Adaptive Multi-objective Preference Optimization without Reward Models and Reference ModelsQi Liu, Jingqing Ruan, Hao Li, Haodong Zhao et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 2 citations
- CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to ProductKaiwen Xue, Chenglong Li, Zhonghong Ou, Guoxin Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With (Ranked) Choice ModelingYuxuan Tang, Yifan FengICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Measuring LLM Novelty As The Frontier Of Original And High-Quality OutputVishakh Padmakumar, Chen Yueh-Han, Jane Pan, Valerie Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Adversarial Preference Optimization: Enhancing Your Alignment via RM-LLM GamePengyu Cheng, Yifan Yang, Jian Li, Yong Dai et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 6 citations
