MallowsPO: Fine-Tune Your LLM with Preference Dispersions
Haoxian Chen, Hanyang Zhao, Henry Lam, David D. Yao, Wenpin Tang
Abstract
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently emerged as a popular approach to improve reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), leading to better techniques to fine-tune large language models (LLM). A weakness of DPO, however, lies in its lack of capability to characterize the diversity of human preferences. Inspired by Mallows' theory of preference ranking, we develop in this paper a new approach, the MallowsPO. A distinct feature of this approach is a dispersion index, which reflects the dispersion of human preference to prompts. We show that existing DPO models can be reduced to special cases of this dispersion index, thus unified with MallowsPO. More importantly, we demonstrate (empirically) how to use this dispersion index to enhance the performance of DPO in a broad array of benchmark tasks, from synthetic bandit selection to controllable generations and dialogues, while maintaining great generalization capabilities. MallowsPO is also compatible with other SOTA offline preference optimization methods, boosting nearly 2% extra LC win rate when used as a plugin for fine-tuning Llama3-Instruct.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b494272f-510b-4245-adc6-557c592dc4e2Cited by top-tier papers6
- Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous PreferencesAli Shirali, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Abdullah Omar Alomar, Parsa Mirtaheri et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
- ComPO: Preference Alignment via Comparison OraclesPeter Chen, Xi Chen, Wotao Yin, Tianyi LinNeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Pairwise Calibrated Rewards for Pluralistic AlignmentDaniel Halpern, Evi Micha, Ariel D. Procaccia, Itai ShapiraNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Learning to summarize user information for personalized reinforcement learning from human feedbackHyunJi Nam, Yanming Wan, Mickel Liu, Peter F. Ahnn et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With (Ranked) Choice ModelingYuxuan Tang, Yifan FengICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
Related papers
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM AlignmentAman Gupta, Shao Tang, Qingquan Song, Sirou Zhu et al.ICML 2025
- Using Human Feedback to Fine-tune Diffusion Models without Any Reward ModelKai Yang, Jian Tao, Jiafei Lyu, Chunjiang Ge et al.CVPR 2024 · 34 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Token-level Direct Preference OptimizationYongcheng Zeng, Guoqing Liu, Weiyu Ma, Ning Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 136 citations
