AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment
Aman Gupta, Shao Tang, Qingquan Song, Sirou Zhu, Jiwoo Hong, Ankan Saha, Viral Gupta, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Siyu Zhu, Parag Agrawal, Natesh S. Pillai, S. Sathiya Keerthi
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and its variants have made huge strides toward the effective alignment of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions and reflect human values. More recently, Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) have emerged in which the reward modeling stage of RLHF is skipped by characterizing the reward directly as a function of the policy being learned. Some popular examples of DAAs include Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO). These methods often suffer from likelihood displacement, a phenomenon by which the probabilities of preferred responses are often reduced undesirably. In this paper, we argue that, for DAAs the reward (function) shape matters. We introduce AlphaPO, a new DAA method that leverages an α-parameter to help change the shape of the reward function beyond the standard log reward. AlphaPO helps maintain fine-grained control over likelihood displacement and overoptimization. Compared to SimPO, one of the best performing DAAs, AlphaPO leads to about 7% to 10% relative improvement in alignment performance for the instruct versions of Mistral-7B and Llama3-8B while achieving 15% to 50% relative improvement over DPO on the same models. The analysis and results presented highlight the importance of the reward shape and how one can systematically change it to affect training dynamics, as well as improve alignment performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 03e40891-72b2-4c6a-a7a4-cda5d56d383aCited by top-tier papers6
- Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald et al.ICML 2026 · 571 citations
- Margin-Aware Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion Models Without ReferenceJiwoo Hong, Sayak Paul, Noah Lee, Kashif Rasul et al.AAAI 2026 · 43 citations
- The Differences Between Direct Alignment Algorithms are a BlurAlexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Viacheslav Sinii, Alexey Malakhov et al.ICML 2026
- On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model AlignmentJiwoo Hong, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Guijin Son et al.ICML 2025
- GeoAlign: Geometric Rollout Curation for Robust LLM Reinforcement LearningTing Zhou, Zhenqing Ling, Yiyang Zhao, Ying Shen et al.ICML 2026
Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human FeedbackHongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Chuanqi Tan, Wei Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 515 citations
Related papers
- AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.ICML 2025
- Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay PerspectiveRuichen Shao, Bei Li, Gangao Liu, Yang Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- ConfPO: Exploiting Policy Model Confidence for Critical Token Selection in Preference OptimizationHee Suk Yoon, Eunseop Yoon, Mark A. Hasegawa-Johnson, Sungwoong Kim et al.ICML 2025
- Mitigating Reward Over-optimization in Direct Alignment Algorithms with Importance SamplingPhuc Minh Nguyen, Ngoc-Hieu Nguyen, Duy M. H. Nguyen, Anji Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM AlignmentXiaoyang Cao, Zelai Xu, Mo Guang, Kaiwen Long et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
