Meta-Learning Objectives for Preference Optimization
Carlo Alfano, Silvia Sapora, Jakob N. Foerster, Patrick Rebeschini, Yee Whye Teh
Abstract
Evaluating preference optimization (PO) algorithms on LLM alignment is a challenging task that presents prohibitive costs, noise, and several variables like model size and hyper-parameters. In this work, we show that it is possible to gain insights on the efficacy of PO algorithm on simpler benchmarks. We design a diagnostic suite of MuJoCo tasks and datasets, which we use to systematically evaluate PO algorithms, establishing a more controlled and cheaper benchmark. We then propose a novel family of PO algorithms based on mirror descent, which we call Mirror Preference Optimization (MPO). Through evolutionary strategies, we search this class to discover algorithms specialized to specific properties of preference datasets, such as mixed-quality or noisy data. We demonstrate that our discovered PO algorithms outperform all known algorithms in the targeted MuJoCo settings. Finally, based on the insights gained from our MuJoCo experiments, we design a PO algorithm that significantly outperform existing baselines in an LLM alignment task.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d4438594-65d3-47c8-8804-4f829efd7d3bCited by top-tier papers2
- Preference Optimization by Estimating the Ratio of the Data DistributionYeongmin Kim, HeeSun Bae, Byeonghu Na, Il-Chul MoonNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- DPO Unchained: Your Training Algorithm is Secretly Disentangled in Human Choice Theory (and Its Loss' Convexity is Dispensable)Wenxuan Zhou, Shujian Zhang, brice magdalou, John Lambert et al.ICML 2026
Builds on16
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human FeedbackHongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Chuanqi Tan, Wei Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 515 citations
- Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine TranslationHaoran Xu, Amr Sharaf, Yunmo Chen, Weiting Tan et al.ICML 2024 · 447 citations
Related papers
- RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM AlignmentXiaoyang Cao, Zelai Xu, Mo Guang, Kaiwen Long et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference RankingsAngelica Chen, Sadhika Malladi, Lily H. Zhang, Xinyi Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
- MPO: An Efficient Post-Processing Framework for Mixing Diverse Preference AlignmentTianze Wang, Dongnan Gui, Yifan Hu, Shuhang Lin et al.ICML 2025
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Alignment-Aware DecodingFrédéric Berdoz, Luca Lanzendörfer, René Caky, Roger WattenhoferICML 2026 · 1 citation
