Preference Optimization by Estimating the Ratio of the Data Distribution
Yeongmin Kim, HeeSun Bae, Byeonghu Na, Il-Chul Moon
Abstract
Direct preference optimization (DPO) is widely used as a simple and stable method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. This paper investigates a generalized DPO loss that enables a policy model to match the target policy from a likelihood ratio estimation perspective. The ratio of the target policy provides a unique identification of the policy distribution without relying on reward models or partition functions. This allows the generalized loss to retain both simplicity and theoretical guarantees, which prior work such as -PO fails to achieve simultaneously. We propose Bregman preference optimization (BPO), a generalized framework for ratio matching that provides a family of objective functions achieving target policy optimality. BPO subsumes DPO as a special case and offers tractable forms for all instances, allowing implementation with a few lines of code. We further develop scaled Basu's power divergence (SBA), a gradient scaling method that can be used for BPO instances. The BPO framework complements other DPO variants and is applicable to target policies defined by these variants. In experiments, unlike other probabilistic loss extensions such as -DPO or -PO, which exhibit a trade-off between generation fidelity and diversity, instances of BPO improve both win rate and entropy compared with DPO. When applied to Llama-3-8B-Instruct, BPO achieves state-of-the-art performance among Llama-3-8B backbones, with a 55.9% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval2. Project page: https://github.com/aailab-kaist/BPO.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 036ec9a8-263a-4877-b0a3-c3d45d8adcaaCited by top-tier papers3
- Lookahead Sample Reward Guidance for Test-Time Scaling of Diffusion ModelsYeongmin Kim, Donghyeok Shin, Byeonghu Na, Minsang Park et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- TokenRatio: Principled Token-Level Preference Optimization via Ratio MatchingTruong Nguyen, Tien-Phat Nguyen, Linh Van, Duy Nguyen et al.ICML 2026
- Towards Disentangled Preference Optimization Dynamics: Suppress the Loser, Preserve the WinnerWei Chen, Yubing Wu, Junmei Yang, Delu Zeng et al.ICML 2026
Builds on30
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
Related papers
- Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald et al.ICML 2026 · 571 citations
- AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.ICML 2025
- -SPPO: Semantic-Calibrated Self-Play Preference OptimizationXiwen Chen, Wenhui Zhu, Jingjing Wang, Peijie Qiu et al.ICML 2026
- DiffPO: Diffusion-styled Preference Optimization for Inference Time Alignment of Large Language ModelsRuizhe Chen, Wenhao Chai, Zhifei Yang, Xiaotian Zhang et al.ACL 2025
- Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay PerspectiveRuichen Shao, Bei Li, Gangao Liu, Yang Chen et al.ICLR 2025
