Lookahead Sample Reward Guidance for Test-Time Scaling of Diffusion Models
Yeongmin Kim, Donghyeok Shin, Byeonghu Na, Minsang Park, Richard Lee Kim, IL CHUL MOON
Abstract
Diffusion models have demonstrated strong generative performance; however, generated samples often fail to fully align with human intent. This paper studies a test-time scaling method that enables sampling from regions with higher human-aligned reward values. Existing gradient guidance methods approximate the expected future reward (EFR) at an intermediate particle using a Taylor approximation, but this approximation at each time step incurs high computational cost due to sequential neural backpropagation. We show that the EFR at any can be computed using only marginal samples from a pre-trained diffusion model. The proposed EFR formulation detaches the neural dependency between and the EFR, enabling closed-form guidance computation without neural backpropagation. To further improve efficiency, we introduce lookahead sampling to collect marginal samples. For final sample generation, we use an accurate solver that guides particles toward high-reward lookahead samples. We refer to this sampling scheme as LiDAR sampling. LiDAR achieves substantial performance improvements using only three samples with a 3-step lookahead solver, exhibiting steep performance gains as lookahead accuracy and sample count increase; notably, it reaches the same GenEval performance as the latest gradient guidance method for SDXL with a 9.5× speedup.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e51972c7-7a18-49ea-9a42-0dbb325034cbBuilds on43
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
Related papers
- Diffusion Tree Sampling: Scalable inference‑time alignment of diffusion modelsVineet Jain, Kusha Sareen, Mohammad Pedramfar, Siamak RavanbakhshNeurIPS 2025 · 41 citations
- Calibrated Test-Time Guidance for Bayesian InferenceDaniel Geyfman, Felix Draxler, Jan Groeneveld, Hyunsoo Lee et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Tree-Guided Diffusion PlannerHyeonseong Jeon, Cheolhong Min, Jaesik ParkNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- ETS: Energy-Guided Test-Time Scaling for Training-Free RL AlignmentXiuyu Li, Jinkai Zhang, Mingyang Yi, Yu Li et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Test-time Alignment of Diffusion Models without Reward Over-optimizationSunwoo Kim, Minkyu Kim, Dongmin ParkICLR 2025
