Controllable Neural Symbolic Regression
Tommaso Bendinelli, Luca Biggio, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny
Abstract
In symbolic regression, the goal is to find an analytical expression that accurately fits experimental data with the minimal use of mathematical symbols such as operators, variables, and constants. However, the combinatorial space of possible expressions can make it challenging for traditional evolutionary algorithms to find the correct expression in a reasonable amount of time. To address this issue, Neural Symbolic Regression (NSR) algorithms have been developed that can quickly identify patterns in the data and generate analytical expressions. However, these methods, in their current form, lack the capability to incorporate user-defined prior knowledge, which is often required in natural sciences and engineering fields. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel neural symbolic regression method, named Neural Symbolic Regression with Hypothesis (NSRwH) that enables the explicit incorporation of assumptions about the expected structure of the ground-truth expression into the prediction process. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed conditioned deep learning model outperforms its unconditioned counterparts in terms of accuracy while also providing control over the predicted expression structure.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 364b16e4-b6dd-4370-b764-3e3bed63e4daCited by top-tier papers6
- EGG-SR: Embedding Symbolic Equivalence into Symbolic Regression via Equality GraphNan Jiang, Ziyi Wang, Yexiang XueICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Mixture of Concept Bottleneck ExpertsFrancesco De Santis, Gabriele Ciravegna, Giovanni De Felice, Arianna Casanova et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Symbolic regression via MDLformer-guided search: from minimizing prediction error to minimizing description lengthZihan Yu, Jingtao Ding, Yong Li, Depeng JinICLR 2025
- Breaking the Simplification Bottleneck in Amortized Neural Symbolic RegressionPaul Saegert, Ullrich KoetheICML 2026
- Stabilizing Equation Learning via Zero-Point ConstraintsSannyuya Liu, Ao Chen, Lin Liu, Ruxia Liang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on7
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
- Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive BiasesMiles D. Cranmer, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. Battaglia, Rui Xu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 736 citations
- Deep Learning For Symbolic MathematicsGuillaume Lample, François ChartonICLR 2020 · 477 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitySilviu-Marian Udrescu, Andrew K. Tan, Jiahai Feng, Orisvaldo Neto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 267 citations
Related papers
- RAG-SR: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Neural Symbolic RegressionHengzhe Zhang, Qi Chen, Bing Xue, Wolfgang Banzhaf et al.ICLR 2025
- Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-SearchPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Guillaume Lample, Sylvain Lamprier, Marco VirgolinICML 2023 · 50 citations
- A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic RegressionMikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Jiachen Yang, Ruben Glatt et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 160 citations
- Syntax-Aware Retrieval Augmentation for Neural Symbolic RegressionCanmiao Zhou, Han HuangEMNLP 2025
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
