Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural Networks
Yash Savani, Colin White, Naveen Sundar Govindarajulu
Abstract
As deep learning models become tasked with more and more decisions that impact human lives, such as criminal recidivism, loan repayment, and face recognition for law enforcement, bias is becoming a growing concern. Debiasing algorithms are typically split into three paradigms: pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing. However, in computer vision or natural language applications, it is common to start with a large generic model and then fine-tune to a specific use-case. Pre- or in-processing methods would require retraining the entire model from scratch, while post-processing methods only have black-box access to the model, so they do not leverage the weights of the trained model. Creating debiasing algorithms specifically for this fine-tuning use-case has largely been neglected. In this work, we initiate the study of a new paradigm in debiasing research, intra-processing, which sits between in-processing and post-processing methods. Intra-processing methods are designed specifically to debias large models which have been trained on a generic dataset and fine-tuned on a more specific task. We show how to repurpose existing in-processing methods for this use-case, and we also propose three baseline algorithms: random perturbation, layerwise optimization, and adversarial fine-tuning. All of our techniques can be used for all popular group fairness measures such as equalized odds or statistical parity difference. We evaluate these methods across three popular datasets from the AIF360 toolkit, as well as on the CelebA faces dataset. Our code is available at https://github.com/abacusai/intraprocessing_debiasing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- TuneTables: Context Optimization for Scalable Prior-Data Fitted NetworksBenjamin Feuer, Robin Schirrmeister, Valeriia Cherepanova, Chinmay Hegde et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 57 citations
- Are My Deep Learning Systems Fair? An Empirical Study of Fixed-Seed TrainingShangshu Qian, Hung Viet Pham, Thibaud Lutellier, Zeou Hu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 49 citations
- Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face RecognitionSamuel Dooley, Rhea Sanjay Sukthanker, John P. Dickerson, Colin White et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 41 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face VerificationTiago Salvador, Stephanie Cairns, Vikram Voleti, Noah Marshall et al.ICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- FRAPPÉ: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing EverythingAlexandru Tifrea, Preethi Lahoti, Ben Packer, Yoni Halpern et al.ICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Post-hoc bias scoring is optimal for fair classificationWenlong Chen, Yegor Klochkov, Yang LiuICLR 2024 · 12 citations
- Equi-Tuning: Group Equivariant Fine-Tuning of Pretrained ModelsSourya Basu, Prasanna Sattigeri, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Vijil Chenthamarakshan et al.AAAI 2023 · 25 citations
- Mitigate Extrinsic Social Bias in Pre-trained Language Models via Continuous Prompts AdjustmentYiwei Dai, Hengrui Gu, Ying Wang, Xin WangEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
