FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face Verification
Tiago Salvador, Stephanie Cairns, Vikram Voleti, Noah Marshall, Adam M. Oberman
Abstract
Despite being widely used, face recognition models suffer from bias: the probability of a false positive (incorrect face match) strongly depends on sensitive attributes such as the ethnicity of the face. As a result, these models can disproportionately and negatively impact minority groups, particularly when used by law enforcement. The majority of bias reduction methods have several drawbacks: they use an end-to-end retraining approach, may not be feasible due to privacy issues, and often reduce accuracy. An alternative approach is post-processing methods that build fairer decision classifiers using the features of pre-trained models, thus avoiding the cost of retraining. However, they still have drawbacks: they reduce accuracy (AGENDA, PASS, FTC), or require retuning for different false positive rates (FSN). In this work, we introduce the Fairness Calibration (FairCal) method, a post-training approach that simultaneously: (i) increases model accuracy (improving the state-of-the-art), (ii) produces fairly-calibrated probabilities, (iii) significantly reduces the gap in the false positive rates, (iv) does not require knowledge of the sensitive attribute, and (v) does not require retraining, training an additional model, or retuning. We apply it to the task of Face Verification, and obtain state-of-the-art results with all the above advantages.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e5c0eb6-cbb7-458b-9394-7b95e2380973Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Racial Faces in the Wild: Reducing Racial Bias by Information Maximization Adaptation NetworkMei Wang, Weihong Deng, Jiani Hu, Xunqiang Tao et al.ICCV 2019 · 379 citations
- Calibration of Neural Networks using SplinesKartik Gupta, Amir Rahimi, Thalaiyasingam Ajanthan, Thomas Mensink et al.ICLR 2021 · 128 citations
- PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face RecognitionPrithviraj Dhar, Joshua Gleason, Aniket Roy, Carlos Domingo Castillo et al.ICCV 2021 · 53 citations
- Multi-Class Uncertainty Calibration via Mutual Information Maximization-based BinningKanil Patel, William H. Beluch, Bin Yang, Michael Pfeiffer et al.ICLR 2021 · 41 citations
- Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive ClassifierSixue Gong, Xiaoming Liu, Anil K. JainCVPR 2021
Related papers
- Who's the (Multi-)Fairest of Them All: Rethinking Interpolation-Based Data Augmentation Through the Lens of MulticalibrationKarina Halevy, Karly Hou, Charumathi BadrinathAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face RecognitionSamuel Dooley, Rhea Sanjay Sukthanker, John P. Dickerson, Colin White et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 41 citations
- Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural NetworksYash Savani, Colin White, Naveen Sundar GovindarajuluNeurIPS 2020 · 50 citations
- When is Multicalibration Post-Processing Necessary?Dutch Hansen, Siddartha Devic, Preetum Nakkiran, Vatsal SharanNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Improving the Fairness of Image Classification ModelsJunjie Yang, Jiajun Jiang, Zeyu Sun, Junjie ChenISSTA 2024 · 4 citations
