Mitigate Extrinsic Social Bias in Pre-trained Language Models via Continuous Prompts Adjustment
Yiwei Dai, Hengrui Gu, Ying Wang, Xin Wang
Abstract
Although pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been widely used in natural language understandings (NLU), they are still exposed to fairness issues. Most existing extrinsic debiasing methods rely on manually curated word lists for each sensitive groups to modify training data or to add regular constraints. However, these word lists are often limited by length and scope, resulting in the degradation performance of extrinsic bias mitigation. To address the aforementioned issues, we propose a Continuous Prompts Adjustment Debiasing method (CPAD), which generates continuous token lists from the entire vocabulary space and uses them to bridge the gap between outputs and targets in fairness learning process. Specifically, CPAD encapsulates fine-tuning objective and debiasing objectives into several independent prompts. To avoid the limitation of manual word lists, in fairness learning phase, we extract outputs from the entire vocabulary space via fine-tuned PLM. Then, we aggregate the outputs from the same sensitive group as continuous token lists to map the outputs into protected attribute labels. Finally, after we learn the debiasing prompts in the perspective of adversarial learning, we improve fairness by adjusting continuous prompts at model inference time. Through extensive experiments on three NLU tasks, we evaluate the debiasing performance from the perspectives of group fairness and fairness through unawareness. The experimental results show that CPAD outperforms all baselines in term of single and two-attributes debiasing performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c6f4a92-d8a4-4986-a725-215672d7fac2Cited by top-tier papers2
- Do Morals Guide How LLMs Think? The Role of Ethical Perspectives in General Problem SolvingIseo Kim, Eunjin Hong, Juae KimACL 2026
- Multi-Feature Quantized Self-Attention for Fair Large Language ModelsJaeil Park, Sung-Bae ChoICLR 2026
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
- KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation ExtractionXiang Chen, Ningyu Zhang, Xin Xie, Shumin Deng et al.WWW 2022 · 488 citations
- An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsNicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Siva ReddyACL 2022 · 160 citations
Related papers
- Prompt Tuning Pushes Farther, Contrastive Learning Pulls Closer: A Two-Stage Approach to Mitigate Social BiasesYingji Li, Mengnan Du, Xin Wang, Ying WangACL 2023 · 12 citations
- ADEPT: A DEbiasing PrompT FrameworkKe Yang, Charles Yu, Yi Ren Fung, Manling Li et al.AAAI 2023 · 40 citations
- Auto-Debias: Debiasing Masked Language Models with Automated Biased PromptsYue Guo, Yi Yang, Ahmed AbbasiACL 2022
- Causal-Debias: Unifying Debiasing in Pretrained Language Models and Fine-tuning via Causal Invariant LearningFan Zhou, Yuzhou Mao, Liu Yu, Yi Yang et al.ACL 2023 · 21 citations
- Bi-directional Bias Attribution: Debiasing Large Language Models without Modifying PromptsYujie Lin, Kunquan Li, Yixuan Liao, Xiaoxin Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
