Prompt Tuning Pushes Farther, Contrastive Learning Pulls Closer: A Two-Stage Approach to Mitigate Social Biases
Yingji Li, Mengnan Du, Xin Wang, Ying Wang
Abstract
As the representation capability of Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) improve, there is growing concern that they will inherit social biases from unprocessed corpora. Most previous debiasing techniques used Counterfactual Data Augmentation (CDA) to balance the training corpus. However, CDA slightly modifies the original corpus, limiting the representation distance between different demographic groups to a narrow range. As a result, the debiasing model easily fits the differences between counterfactual pairs, which affects its debiasing performance with limited text resources. In this paper, we propose an adversarial training-inspired two-stage debiasing model using Contrastive learning with Continuous Prompt Augmentation (named CCPA) to mitigate social biases in PLMs' encoding. In the first stage, we propose a data augmentation method based on continuous prompt tuning to push farther the representation distance between sample pairs along different demographic groups. In the second stage, we utilize contrastive learning to pull closer the representation distance between the augmented sample pairs and then fine-tune PLMs' parameters to get debiased encoding. Our approach guides the model to achieve stronger debiasing performance by adding difficulty to the training process. Extensive experiments show that CCPA outperforms baselines in terms of debiasing performance. Meanwhile, experimental results on the GLUE benchmark show that CCPA retains the language modeling capability of PLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7a92e6fa-b203-487f-ad83-b36e358d0cd6Cited by top-tier papers2
- What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt?Do Xuan Long, Duy Dinh, Ngoc-Hai Nguyen, Kenji Kawaguchi et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- M3Hop-CoT: Misogynous Meme Identification with Multimodal Multi-hop Chain-of-ThoughtGitanjali Kumari, Kirtan Jain, Asif EkbalEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on17
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- On Measuring and Mitigating Biased Inferences of Word EmbeddingsSunipa Dev, Tao Li, Jeff M. Phillips, Vivek SrikumarAAAI 2020 · 195 citations
- An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsNicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Siva ReddyACL 2022 · 160 citations
- Towards Debiasing Sentence RepresentationsPaul Pu Liang, Irene Mengze Li, Emily Zheng, Yao Chong Lim et al.ACL 2020 · 149 citations
Related papers
- Mitigate Extrinsic Social Bias in Pre-trained Language Models via Continuous Prompts AdjustmentYiwei Dai, Hengrui Gu, Ying Wang, Xin WangEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- ADEPT: A DEbiasing PrompT FrameworkKe Yang, Charles Yu, Yi Ren Fung, Manling Li et al.AAAI 2023 · 40 citations
- Auto-Debias: Debiasing Masked Language Models with Automated Biased PromptsYue Guo, Yi Yang, Ahmed AbbasiACL 2022
- Perturbation Augmentation for Fairer NLPRebecca Qian, Candace Ross, Jude Fernandes, Eric Michael Smith et al.EMNLP 2022 · 54 citations
- An Empirical Analysis of Parameter-Efficient Methods for Debiasing Pre-Trained Language ModelsZhongbin Xie, Thomas LukasiewiczACL 2023 · 22 citations
