ADEPT: A DEbiasing PrompT Framework
Ke Yang, Charles Yu, Yi Ren Fung, Manling Li, Heng Ji
Abstract
Several exisiting approaches have proven that finetuning is an applicable approach for debiasing contextualized word embeddings. Similarly, discrete prompts with semantic meanings have shown to be effective in debiasing tasks. With unfixed mathematical representation at the token level, continuous prompts usually surpass discrete ones at providing a pre-trained language model (PLM) with additional taskspecific information. Despite this, relatively few efforts have been made to debias PLMs by prompt tuning with continuous prompts compared to its discrete counterpart. Furthermore, for most debiasing methods that alter a PLM's original parameters, a major problem is the need to not only decrease the bias in the PLM, but also ensure that the PLM does not lose its representation ability. Finetuning methods typically have a hard time maintaining this balance, as they tend to aggressively remove meanings of attribute words (like the words developing our concepts of "male" and "female" for gender), which also leads to an unstable and unpredictable training process. In this paper, we propose ADEPT, a method to debias PLMs using prompt tuning while maintaining the delicate balance between removing biases and ensuring representation ability 1 . To achieve this, we propose a new training criterion inspired by manifold learning and equip it with an explicit debiasing term to optimize prompt tuning. In addition, we conduct several experiments with regard to the reliability, quality, and quantity of a previously proposed attribute training corpus in order to obtain a clearer prototype of a certain attribute, which indicates the attribute's position and relative distances to other words on the manifold. We evaluate ADEPT on several widely acknowledged debiasing benchmarks and downstream tasks, and find that it achieves competitive results while maintaining (and in some cases even improving) the PLM's representation ability. We further visualize words' correlation before and after debiasing a PLM, and give some possible explanations for the visible effects.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers11
- BendVLM: Test-Time Debiasing of Vision-Language EmbeddingsWalter Gerych, Haoran Zhang, Kimia Hamidieh, Eileen Pan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- NORMSAGE: Multi-Lingual Multi-Cultural Norm Discovery from Conversations On-the-FlyYi Fung, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Hao Guo, Owen Rambow et al.EMNLP 2023 · 17 citations
- Social-Group-Agnostic Bias Mitigation via the Stereotype Content ModelAli Omrani, Alireza Salkhordeh Ziabari, Charles Yu, Preni Golazizian et al.ACL 2023 · 13 citations
- More of the Same: Persistent Representational Harms Under Increased RepresentationJennifer Mickel, Maria De-Arteaga, Liu Leqi, Kevin TianNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Word Embeddings Are Steers for Language ModelsChi Han, Jialiang Xu, Manling Li, Yi Fung et al.ACL 2024 · 8 citations
Builds on9
- Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted DatasetsIrene Solaiman, Christy DennisonNeurIPS 2021 · 276 citations
- An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsNicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Siva ReddyACL 2022 · 160 citations
- Towards Debiasing Sentence RepresentationsPaul Pu Liang, Irene Mengze Li, Emily Zheng, Yao Chong Lim et al.ACL 2020 · 149 citations
- Interpreting Pretrained Contextualized Representations via Reductions to Static EmbeddingsRishi Bommasani, Kelly Davis, Claire CardieACL 2020 · 137 citations
- The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt TuningBrian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, Noah ConstantEMNLP 2021 · 94 citations
Related papers
- Mitigate Extrinsic Social Bias in Pre-trained Language Models via Continuous Prompts AdjustmentYiwei Dai, Hengrui Gu, Ying Wang, Xin WangEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Prompt Tuning Pushes Farther, Contrastive Learning Pulls Closer: A Two-Stage Approach to Mitigate Social BiasesYingji Li, Mengnan Du, Xin Wang, Ying WangACL 2023 · 12 citations
- ADePT: Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningPengwei Tang, Xiaolin Hu, Yong LiuICLR 2025
- An Empirical Analysis of Parameter-Efficient Methods for Debiasing Pre-Trained Language ModelsZhongbin Xie, Thomas LukasiewiczACL 2023 · 22 citations
- Causal-Debias: Unifying Debiasing in Pretrained Language Models and Fine-tuning via Causal Invariant LearningFan Zhou, Yuzhou Mao, Liu Yu, Yi Yang et al.ACL 2023 · 21 citations
