ACL Findings2023
Gender-tuning: Empowering Fine-tuning for Debiasing Pre-trained Language Models
Somayeh Ghanbarzadeh, Yan Huang, Hamid Palangi, Radames Cruz Moreno, Hamed Khanpour
Abstract
Recent studies have revealed that the widelyused Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) propagate societal biases from the large unmoderated pre-training corpora. Existing solutions require debiasing training processes and datasets for debiasing, which are resourceintensive and costly. Furthermore, these methods hurt the PLMs' performance on downstream tasks. In this study, we propose Gendertuning, which debiases the PLMs through finetuning on downstream tasks' datasets. For this aim, Gender-tuning integrates Masked Language Modeling (MLM) training objectives into fine-tuning's training process. Comprehensive experiments show that Gender-tuning outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines in terms of average gender bias scores in PLMs while improving PLMs' performance on downstream tasks solely using the downstream tasks' dataset. Also, Gender-tuning is a deployable debiasing tool for any PLM that works with original fine-tuning.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Fairness Mediator: Neutralize Stereotype Associations to Mitigate Bias in Large Language ModelsYisong Xiao, Aishan Liu, Siyuan Liang, Xianglong Liu et al.ISSTA 2025 · 2 citations
- Walking in Others' Shoes: How Perspective-Taking Guides Large Language Models in Reducing Toxicity and BiasRongwu Xu, Zi'an Zhou, Tianwei Zhang, Zehan Qi et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Mitigate Extrinsic Social Bias in Pre-trained Language Models via Continuous Prompts AdjustmentYiwei Dai, Hengrui Gu, Ying Wang, Xin WangEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on10
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language ModelsSamuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 692 citations
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- On Measuring and Mitigating Biased Inferences of Word EmbeddingsSunipa Dev, Tao Li, Jeff M. Phillips, Vivek SrikumarAAAI 2020 · 195 citations
- An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsNicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Siva ReddyACL 2022 · 160 citations
Related papers
- Causal-Debias: Unifying Debiasing in Pretrained Language Models and Fine-tuning via Causal Invariant LearningFan Zhou, Yuzhou Mao, Liu Yu, Yi Yang et al.ACL 2023 · 21 citations
- ADEPT: A DEbiasing PrompT FrameworkKe Yang, Charles Yu, Yi Ren Fung, Manling Li et al.AAAI 2023 · 40 citations
- Co²PT: Mitigating Bias in Pre-trained Language Models through Counterfactual Contrastive Prompt TuningXiangjue Dong, Ziwei Zhu, Zhuoer Wang, Maria Teleki et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 5 citations
- DiFair: A Benchmark for Disentangled Assessment of Gender Knowledge and BiasMahdi Zakizadeh, Kaveh Eskandari Miandoab, Mohammad Taher PilehvarEMNLP Findings 2023 · 4 citations
- Towards Understanding Task-agnostic Debiasing Through the Lenses of Intrinsic Bias and ForgetfulnessGuangliang Liu, Milad Afshari, Xitong Zhang, Zhiyu Xue et al.ACL Findings 2024
