Lune

ACL Findings2024

Towards Understanding Task-agnostic Debiasing Through the Lenses of Intrinsic Bias and Forgetfulness

Guangliang Liu, Milad Afshari, Xitong Zhang, Zhiyu Xue, Avrajit Ghosh, Bidhan Bashyal, Rongrong Wang, Kristen Marie Johnson

Abstract

While task-agnostic debiasing provides notable generalizability and reduced reliance on downstream data, its impact on language modeling ability and the risk of relearning social biases from downstream task-specific data remain as the two most significant challenges when debiasing Pretrained Language Models (PLMs). The impact on language modeling ability can be alleviated given a high-quality and long-contextualized debiasing corpus, but there remains a deficiency in understanding the specifics of relearning biases. We empirically ascertain that the effectiveness of taskagnostic debiasing hinges on the quantitative bias level of both the task-specific data used for downstream applications and the debiased model. We empirically show that the lower bound of the bias level of the downstream finetuned model can be approximated by the bias level of the debiased model, in most practical cases. To gain a more in-depth understanding of how the parameters of PLMs change during fine-tuning due to the forgetting issue of PLMs, we propose a novel framework which can Propagate Socially-fair Debiasing to Downstream Fine-tuning, ProSocialTuning 1 . Our proposed framework can push the fine-tuned model to approach the bias lower bound during downstream fine-tuning, indicating that the ineffectiveness of debiasing can be alleviated by overcoming the forgetting issue through regularizing successfully debiased attention heads based on the PLMs' bias levels from the stages of pretraining and debiasing 2 .

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on16

  1. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
  2. Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation AnalysisJesse Vig, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yonatan Belinkov, Sharon Qian et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 851 citations
  3. Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language ModelsPaul Pu Liang, Chiyu Wu, Louis-Philippe Morency, Ruslan SalakhutdinovICML 2021 · 495 citations
  4. A Fast Post-Training Pruning Framework for TransformersWoosuk Kwon, Sehoon Kim, Michael W. Mahoney, Joseph Hassoun et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 247 citations
  5. An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsNicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Siva ReddyACL 2022 · 160 citations

Related papers

  1. Causal-Debias: Unifying Debiasing in Pretrained Language Models and Fine-tuning via Causal Invariant LearningFan Zhou, Yuzhou Mao, Liu Yu, Yi Yang et al.ACL 2023 · 21 citations
  2. Gender-tuning: Empowering Fine-tuning for Debiasing Pre-trained Language ModelsSomayeh Ghanbarzadeh, Yan Huang, Hamid Palangi, Radames Cruz Moreno et al.ACL Findings 2023 · 17 citations
  3. Co²PT: Mitigating Bias in Pre-trained Language Models through Counterfactual Contrastive Prompt TuningXiangjue Dong, Ziwei Zhu, Zhuoer Wang, Maria Teleki et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 5 citations
  4. Debiasing Large Language Models with Structured KnowledgeCongda Ma, Tianyu Zhao, Manabu OkumuraACL Findings 2024 · 2 citations
  5. ADEPT: A DEbiasing PrompT FrameworkKe Yang, Charles Yu, Yi Ren Fung, Manling Li et al.AAAI 2023 · 40 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines