FRAPPÉ: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing Everything
Alexandru Tifrea, Preethi Lahoti, Ben Packer, Yoni Halpern, Ahmad Beirami, Flavien Prost
Abstract
Despite achieving promising fairness-error trade-offs, in-processing mitigation techniques for group fairness cannot be employed in numerous practical applications with limited computation resources or no access to the training pipeline of the prediction model. In these situations, post-processing is a viable alternative. However, current methods are tailored to specific problem settings and fairness definitions and hence, are not as broadly applicable as in-processing. In this work, we propose a framework that turns any regularized in-processing method into a post-processing approach. This procedure prescribes a way to obtain post-processing techniques for a much broader range of problem settings than the prior post-processing literature. We show theoretically and through extensive experiments that our framework preserves the good fairness-error trade-offs achieved with in-processing and can improve over the effectiveness of prior post-processing methods. Finally, we demonstrate several advantages of a modular mitigation strategy that disentangles the training of the prediction model from the fairness mitigation, including better performance on tasks with partial group labels.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- When is Multicalibration Post-Processing Necessary?Dutch Hansen, Siddartha Devic, Preetum Nakkiran, Vatsal SharanNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Achievable Fairness on Your Data With Utility GuaranteesMuhammad Faaiz Taufiq, Jean-Francois Ton, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Decoupling Bias, Aligning Distributions: Synergistic Fairness Optimization for Deepfake DetectionFeng Ding, Wenhui Yi, Yunpeng Zhou, Xinan He et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Breaking the Dyadic Barrier: Rethinking Fairness in Link Prediction Beyond Demographic ParityJoão Mattos, Debolina Halder Lina, Arlei SilvaAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- FROC: Building Fair ROC from a Trained ClassifierAvyukta Manjunatha Vummintala, Shantanu Das, Sujit GujarAAAI 2025
Builds on21
- Distributionally Robust Neural NetworksShiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, Percy LiangICLR 2020 · 1,578 citations
- Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentAditya Krishna Menon, Sadeep Jayasumana, Ankit Singh Rawat, Himanshu Jain et al.ICLR 2021 · 937 citations
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan et al.ICML 2021 · 683 citations
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted LearningPreethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
Related papers
- Experimental Analysis of Multi-Step Pipelines for Fair Classifications - More than the Sum of Their Parts?Nico Lässig, Melanie HerschelICDE 2025
- Fair Classification with Efficient and Post-hoc Controllable Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offMaaya Sakata, Kazuto FukuchiICML 2026
- Group-Aware Threshold Adaptation for Fair ClassificationTaeuk Jang, Pengyi Shi, Xiaoqian WangAAAI 2022 · 49 citations
- Popularizing Fairness: Group Fairness and Individual WelfareAndrew Estornell, Sanmay Das, Brendan Juba, Yevgeniy VorobeychikAAAI 2023 · 1 citation
- Post-processing for Individual FairnessFelix Petersen, Debarghya Mukherjee, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail YurochkinNeurIPS 2021 · 115 citations
