Post-hoc bias scoring is optimal for fair classification
Wenlong Chen, Yegor Klochkov, Yang Liu
Abstract
We consider a binary classification problem under group fairness constraints, which can be one of Demographic Parity (DP), Equalized Opportunity (EOp), or Equalized Odds (EO). We propose an explicit characterization of Bayes optimal classifier under the fairness constraints, which turns out to be a simple modification rule of the unconstrained classifier. Namely, we introduce a novel instancelevel measure of bias, which we call bias score, and the modification rule is a simple linear rule on top of the finite amount of bias scores. Based on this characterization, we develop a post-hoc approach that allows us to adapt to fairness constraints while maintaining high accuracy. In the case of DP and EOp constraints, the modification rule is thresholding a single bias score, while in the case of EO constraints we are required to fit a linear modification rule with 2 parameters. The method can also be applied for composite group-fairness criteria, such as ones involving several sensitive attributes. We achieve competitive or better performance compared to both in-processing and post-processing methods across three datasets: Adult, COMPAS, and CelebA. Unlike most post-processing methods, we do not require access to sensitive attributes during the inference time.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 04e3fa16-19c0-4817-bc46-c20c0e5d8cc6Cited by top-tier papers11
- Fairness without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling ApproachJinlong Pang, Jialu Wang, Zhaowei Zhu, Yuanshun Yao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- A Unifying Post-Processing Framework for Multi-Objective Learn-to-Defer ProblemsMohammad-Amin Charusaie, Samira SamadiNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- On the Maximal Local Disparity of Fairness-Aware ClassifiersJinqiu Jin, Haoxuan Li, Fuli FengICML 2024 · 5 citations
- FedFACT: A Provable Framework for Controllable Group-Fairness Calibration in Federated LearningLi Zhang, Zhongxuan Han, Xiaohua Feng, Jiaming Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Bayes-Optimal Fair Classification with Multiple Sensitive FeaturesYi Yang, Yinghui Huang, Xiangyu ChangAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on9
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Robust Fairness Under Covariate ShiftAshkan Rezaei, Anqi Liu, Omid Memarrast, Brian D. ZiebartAAAI 2021 · 94 citations
- Stability and Deviation Optimal Risk Bounds with Convergence Rate Yegor Klochkov, Nikita ZhivotovskiyNeurIPS 2021 · 72 citations
- Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute ClassificationSungho Park, Jewook Lee, Pilhyeon Lee, Sunhee Hwang et al.CVPR 2022 · 61 citations
- Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-ProcessingRuicheng Xian, Lang Yin, Han ZhaoICML 2023 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Fair Classification by Direct Intervention on Operating CharacteristicsKevin Jiang, Edgar DobribanICLR 2026
- Fair Decisions from Calibrated Scores: Achieving Optimal Classification While Satisfying SufficiencyEtam Benger, Katrina LigettICML 2026
- Estimating and Controlling for Equalized Odds via Sensitive Attribute PredictorsBeepul Bharti, Paul H. Yi, Jeremias SulamNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- A Causal Look at Statistical Definitions of DiscriminationElias Chaibub NetoKDD 2020 · 3 citations
- Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning ModelsMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed AbroshanNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
