Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning Models
Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed Abroshan
Abstract
We consider a selection problem where sequentially arrived applicants apply for a limited number of positions/jobs. At each time step, a decision maker accepts or rejects the given applicant using a pre-trained supervised learning model until all the vacant positions are filled. In this paper, we discuss whether the fairness notions (e.g., equal opportunity, statistical parity, etc.) that are commonly used in classification problems are suitable for the sequential selection problems. In particular, we show that even with a pre-trained model that satisfies the common fairness notions, the selection outcomes may still be biased against certain demographic groups. This observation implies that the fairness notions used in classification problems are not suitable for a selection problem where the applicants compete for a limited number of positions. We introduce a new fairness notion, "Equal Selection (ES)," suitable for sequential selection problems and propose a post-processing approach to satisfy the ES fairness notion. We also consider a setting where the applicants have privacy concerns, and the decision maker only has access to the noisy version of sensitive attributes. In this setting, we can show that the perfect ES fairness can still be attained under certain conditions. 1. Pre-processing: remove pre-existing biases by modifying the training datasets before the training process [20, 21]; 2. In-processing: impose certain fairness constraint during the training process, e.g., solve a constrained optimization problem or add a regularizer to the objective function [22, 23] ; 3. Post-processing: mitigate biases by changing the output of an existing algorithm [10, 24] . Among fairness constraints, statistical parity, equalized odds, and equal opportunity have gained an increasing attention in supervised learning. Dwork et al. [25] studies the relation between individual fairness and statistical parity. They identify conditions under which individual fairness implies
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 843994f9-b645-4b1d-bb78-6488b637b2c6Cited by top-tier papers6
- Fairness Interventions as (Dis)Incentives for Strategic ManipulationXueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Kun Jin, Parinaz Naghizadeh et al.ICML 2022 · 27 citations
- Counterfactually Fair RepresentationZhiqun Zuo, Mahdi Khalili, Xueru ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Loss Balancing for Fair Supervised LearningMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed AbroshanICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Classification Under Strategic Self-SelectionGuy Horowitz, Yonatan Sommer, Moran Koren, Nir RosenfeldICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Toward Fairness Without Harm from Vision to LVLMsXuwei Tan, Ziyu Hu, Xueru ZhangICLR 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on5
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected GroupsSerena Lutong Wang, Wenshuo Guo, Harikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 134 citations
- How do fair decisions fare in long-term qualification?Xueru Zhang, Ruibo Tu, Yang Liu, Mingyan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 87 citations
- Fair Learning with Private Demographic DataHussein Mozannar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Nathan SrebroICML 2020 · 85 citations
- Improving Fairness and Privacy in Selection ProblemsMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed Abroshan, Somayeh SojoudiAAAI 2021 · 32 citations
Related papers
- Bayes-Optimal Fair Classification with Multiple Sensitive FeaturesYi Yang, Yinghui Huang, Xiangyu ChangAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Post-hoc bias scoring is optimal for fair classificationWenlong Chen, Yegor Klochkov, Yang LiuICLR 2024 · 12 citations
- Estimating and Controlling for Equalized Odds via Sensitive Attribute PredictorsBeepul Bharti, Paul H. Yi, Jeremias SulamNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- Fairness Transferability Subject to Bounded Distribution ShiftYatong Chen, Reilly Raab, Jialu Wang, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2022 · 40 citations
- FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model FairnessYuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Euijong Whang, Changho SuhICLR 2021 · 156 citations
