Loss Balancing for Fair Supervised Learning
Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed Abroshan
Abstract
Supervised learning models have been used in various domains such as lending, college admission, face recognition, natural language processing, etc. However, they may inherit pre-existing biases from training data and exhibit discrimination against protected social groups. Various fairness notions have been proposed to address unfairness issues. In this work, we focus on Equalized Loss (EL), a fairness notion that requires the expected loss to be (approximately) equalized across different groups. Imposing EL on the learning process leads to a non-convex optimization problem even if the loss function is convex, and the existing fair learning algorithms cannot properly be adopted to find the fair predictor under the EL constraint. This paper introduces an algorithm that can leverage off-the-shelf convex programming tools (e.g., CVXPY (Diamond and Boyd, 2016; Agrawal et al., 2018) ) to efficiently find the global optimum of this non-convex optimization. In particular, we propose the ELminimizer algorithm, which finds the optimal fair predictor under EL by reducing the non-convex optimization to a sequence of convex optimization problems. We theoretically prove that our algorithm finds the global optimal solution under certain conditions. Then, we support our theoretical results through several empirical studies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Improved Balanced Classification with Theoretically Grounded Loss FunctionsCorinna Cortes, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Counterfactually Fair RepresentationZhiqun Zuo, Mahdi Khalili, Xueru ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative PredictionKun Jin, Tian Xie, Yang Liu, Xueru ZhangAAAI 2026 · 13 citations
- Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Toward Fairness Without Harm from Vision to LVLMsXuwei Tan, Ziyu Hu, Xueru ZhangICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Meta Optimality for Demographic Parity Constrained Regression via Post-ProcessingKazuto FukuchiICML 2025
Builds on6
- FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model FairnessYuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Euijong Whang, Changho SuhICLR 2021 · 156 citations
- Too Relaxed to Be FairMichael Lohaus, Michaël Perrot, Ulrike von LuxburgICML 2020 · 80 citations
- Data preprocessing to mitigate bias: A maximum entropy based approachL. Elisa Celis, Vijay Keswani, Nisheeth K. VishnoiICML 2020 · 45 citations
- Improving Fairness and Privacy in Selection ProblemsMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed Abroshan, Somayeh SojoudiAAAI 2021 · 32 citations
- Fairness Interventions as (Dis)Incentives for Strategic ManipulationXueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Kun Jin, Parinaz Naghizadeh et al.ICML 2022 · 27 citations
Related papers
- FIFA: Making Fairness More Generalizable in Classifiers Trained on Imbalanced DataZhun Deng, Jiayao Zhang, Linjun Zhang, Ting Ye et al.ICLR 2023 · 7 citations
- Fair Generalized Linear Models with a Convex PenaltyHyungrok Do, Preston Putzel, Axel S. Martin, Padhraic Smyth et al.ICML 2022 · 19 citations
- Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair LearningAndrew Lowy, Devansh Gupta, Meisam RazaviyaynICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Omnipredictors for Constrained OptimizationLunjia Hu, Inbal Rachel Livni Navon, Omer Reingold, Chutong YangICML 2023 · 17 citations
- FaiREE: fair classification with finite-sample and distribution-free guaranteePuheng Li, James Zou, Linjun ZhangICLR 2023
