FIFA: Making Fairness More Generalizable in Classifiers Trained on Imbalanced Data
Zhun Deng, Jiayao Zhang, Linjun Zhang, Ting Ye, Yates Coley, Weijie J. Su, James Zou
Abstract
Algorithmic fairness plays an important role in machine learning and imposing fairness constraints during learning is a common approach. However, many datasets are imbalanced in certain label classes (e.g. "healthy") and sensitive subgroups (e.g. "older patients"). Empirically, this imbalance leads to a lack of generalizability not only of classification, but also of fairness properties, especially in over-parameterized models. For example, fairness-aware training may ensure equalized odds (EO) on the training data, but EO is far from being satisfied on new users. In this paper, we propose a theoretically-principled, yet Flexible approach that is Imbalance-Fairness-Aware (FIFA). Specifically, FIFA encourages both classification and fairness generalization and can be flexibly combined with many existing fair learning methods with logits-based losses. While our main focus is on EO, FIFA can be directly applied to achieve equalized opportunity (EqOpt); and under certain conditions, it can also be applied to other fairness notions. We demonstrate the power of FIFA by combining it with a popular fair classification algorithm, and the resulting algorithm achieves significantly better fairness generalization on several real-world datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 667559cd-3afe-43f6-8ea9-e4ca650a8972Cited by top-tier papers3
- Sifting through the Chaff: On Utilizing Execution Feedback for Ranking the Generated Code CandidatesZhihong Sun, Yao Wan, Jia Li, Hongyu Zhang et al.ASE 2024 · 5 citations
- Some Optimizers are More Equal: Understanding the Role of Optimizers in Group FairnessMojtaba Kolahdouzi, Hatice Gunes, Ali EtemadNeurIPS 2025
- Fair Scratch Tickets: Finding Fair Sparse Networks without Weight TrainingPengwei Tang, Wei Yao, Zhicong Li, Yong LiuCVPR 2023
Builds on14
- Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data HurtPreetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,108 citations
- An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious CorrelationsShiori Sagawa, Aditi Raghunathan, Pang Wei Koh, Percy LiangICML 2020 · 436 citations
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted LearningPreethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?Linjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi, Amirata Ghorbani et al.ICLR 2021 · 294 citations
Related papers
- FaiREE: fair classification with finite-sample and distribution-free guaranteePuheng Li, James Zou, Linjun ZhangICLR 2023
- Learning with Statistical Equality ConstraintsAneesh Barthakur, Luiz F. O. ChamonNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with InfluencePeizhao Li, Hongfu LiuICML 2022 · 57 citations
- Understanding and Improving Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offs in Multi-Task LearningYuyan Wang, Xuezhi Wang, Alex Beutel, Flavien Prost et al.KDD 2021 · 42 citations
- Loss Balancing for Fair Supervised LearningMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed AbroshanICML 2023 · 14 citations
