Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AI
Michael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. Wallach
Abstract
Many organizations have published principles intended to guide the ethical development and deployment of AI systems; however, their abstract nature makes them difficult to operationalize. Some organizations have therefore produced AI ethics checklists, as well as checklists for more specific concepts, such as fairness, as applied to AI systems. But unless checklists are grounded in practitioners' needs, they may be misused. To understand the role of checklists in AI ethics, we conducted an iterative co-design process with 48 practitioners, focusing on fairness. We co-designed an AI fairness checklist and identified desiderata and concerns for AI fairness checklists in general. We found that AI fairness checklists could provide organizational infrastructure for formalizing ad-hoc processes and empowering individual advocates. We highlight aspects of organizational culture that may impact the efficacy of AI fairness checklists, and suggest future design directions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a38d46c0-61fc-4704-ab0f-11985753e0dcCited by top-tier papers82
- Design Principles for Generative AI ApplicationsJustin D. Weisz, Jessica He, Michael J. Muller, Gabriela Hoefer et al.CHI 2024 · 221 citations
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 156 citations
- Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for SupportMichael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CSCW 2022 · 149 citations
- Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer VisionMilagros Miceli, Martin Schuessler, Tianling YangCSCW 2020 · 148 citations
- Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and ProcessNadia Nahar, Shurui Zhou, Grace A. Lewis, Christian KästnerICSE 2022 · 122 citations
Related papers
- Tinker, Tailor, Configure, Customize: The Articulation Work of Contextualizing an AI Fairness ChecklistMichael A. Madaio, Jingya Chen, Hanna M. Wallach, Jennifer Wortman VaughanCSCW 2024 · 13 citations
- A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness EvaluationsGlen Berman, Nitesh Goyal, Michael MadaioCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- RAI Guidelines: Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines Grounded in Regulations and Usable by (Non-)Technical RolesMarios Constantinides, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele Quercia, Susanna Kallio et al.CSCW 2024 · 28 citations
- Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI EthicsRichmond Y. Wong, Michael A. Madaio, Nick MerrillCSCW 2023 · 108 citations
- Guidelines for Integrating Value Sensitive Design in Responsible AI ToolkitsMalak Sadek, Marios Constantinides, Daniele Quercia, Céline MougenotCHI 2024 · 49 citations
