Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer Vision
Milagros Miceli, Martin Schuessler, Tianling Yang
Abstract
The interpretation of data is fundamental to machine learning. This paper investigates practices of image data annotation as performed in industrial contexts. We define data annotation as a sense-making practice, where annotators assign meaning to data through the use of labels. Previous human-centered investigations have largely focused on annotators? subjectivity as a major cause of biased labels. We propose a wider view on this issue: guided by constructivist grounded theory, we conducted several weeks of fieldwork at two annotation companies. We analyzed which structures, power relations, and naturalized impositions shape the interpretation of data. Our results show that the work of annotators is profoundly informed by the interests, values, and priorities of other actors above their station. Arbitrary classifications are vertically imposed on annotators, and through them, on data. This imposition is largely naturalized. Assigning meaning to data is often presented as a technical matter. This paper shows it is, in fact, an exercise of power with multiple implications for individuals and society.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0e74d930-a0f3-49bd-a6d5-abe00dfe5f12Cited by top-tier papers30
- Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for SupportMichael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CSCW 2022 · 149 citations
- The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI ExplanationsUpol Ehsan, Samir Passi, Q. Vera Liao, Larry Chan et al.CHI 2024 · 121 citations
- The Data-Production DispositifMilagros Miceli, Julian PosadaCSCW 2022 · 117 citations
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
- Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotationDing Wang, Shantanu Prabhat, Nithya SambasivanCHI 2022 · 66 citations
Builds on3
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- How We've Taught Algorithms to See Identity: Constructing Race and Gender in Image Databases for Facial AnalysisMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Kandrea Wade, Caitlin Lustig, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2020 · 198 citations
- Bureaucracy as a Lens for Analyzing and Designing Algorithmic SystemsJuho Pääkkönen, Matti Nelimarkka, Jesse Haapoja, Airi LampinenCHI 2020 · 36 citations
Related papers
- Constructing a Classification Scheme - and its Consequences: A Field Study of Learning to Label Data for Computer Vision in a Hospital Intensive Care UnitMelissa A. Valentine, Roger E. Bohn, Amanda L. Pratt, Prachee Jain et al.CSCW 2024 · 2 citations
- Products of Positionality: How Tech Workers Shape Identity Concepts in Computer VisionMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jed R. BrubakerCHI 2024 · 20 citations
- How Data Workers Shape Datasets: The Role of Positionality in Data Collection and Annotation for Computer VisionMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Allison Woodruff, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- Making Data Work CountSrravya Chandhiramowuli, Alex S. Taylor, Sara Heitlinger, Ding WangCSCW 2024 · 25 citations
- The Social Construction of Visualizations: Practitioner Challenges and Experiences of Visualizing Race and GenderPriya Dhawka, Sayamindu DasguptaCHI 2025 · 3 citations
