Bureaucracy as a Lens for Analyzing and Designing Algorithmic Systems
Juho Pääkkönen, Matti Nelimarkka, Jesse Haapoja, Airi Lampinen
Abstract
Scholarship on algorithms has drawn on the analogy between algorithmic systems and bureaucracies to diagnose shortcom ings in algorithmic decision-making. We extend the analogy further by drawing on Michel Crozier's theory of bureaucratic organizations to analyze the relationship between algorithmic and human decision-making power. We present algorithms as analogous to impartial bureaucratic rules for controlling action, and argue that discretionary decision-making power in algorithmic systems accumulates at locations where un certainty about the operation of algorithms persists. This key point of our essay connects with Alkhatib and Bernstein's the ory of 'street-level algorithms', and highlights that the role of human discretion in algorithmic systems is to accommodate uncertain situations which inflexible algorithms cannot han dle. We conclude by discussing how the analysis and design of algorithmic systems could seek to identify and cultivate important sources of uncertainty, to enable the human discre tionary work that enhances systemic resilience in the face of algorithmic errors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d725ecb1-d3c6-4ff9-9a98-8c3c3674a473Cited by top-tier papers8
- Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer VisionMilagros Miceli, Martin Schuessler, Tianling YangCSCW 2020 · 148 citations
- A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-WelfareDevansh Saxena, Karla A. Badillo-Urquiola, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Shion GuhaCSCW 2021 · 133 citations
- Rethinking "Risk" in Algorithmic Systems Through A Computational Narrative Analysis of Casenotes in Child-WelfareDevansh Saxena, Erina Seh-Young Moon, Aryan Chaurasia, Yixin Guan et al.CHI 2023 · 35 citations
- Understanding Contestability on the Margins: Implications for the Design of Algorithmic Decision-making in Public ServicesNaveena Karusala, Sohini Upadhyay, Rajesh Veeraraghavan, Krzysztof Z. GajosCHI 2024 · 33 citations
- Unpacking Invisible Work Practices, Constraints, and Latent Power Relationships in Child Welfare through Casenote AnalysisDevansh Saxena, Erina Seh-Young Moon, Dahlia Shehata, Shion GuhaCHI 2022 · 33 citations
Related papers
- To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd OutcomesAli AlkhatibCHI 2021 · 80 citations
- Street-Level Algorithms and AI in Bureaucratic Decision-Making: A Caseworker PerspectiveAsbjørn Ammitzbøll Flügge, Thomas T. Hildebrandt, Naja L. Holten MøllerCSCW 2021 · 78 citations
- Who is the Expert? Reconciling Algorithm Aversion and Algorithm Appreciation in AI-Supported Decision MakingYoyo Tsung-Yu Hou, Malte F. JungCSCW 2021 · 111 citations
- Intermediation: Algorithmic Prioritization in Practice in Homeless ServicesPelle Tracey, Patricia GarciaCSCW 2024 · 5 citations
- The Algorithm and the Org Chart: How Algorithms Can Conflict with Organizational StructuresMelissa A. Valentine, Amanda L. Pratt, Rebecca Hinds, Michael S. BernsteinCSCW 2024 · 4 citations
