Lune

CHI2020Top-tier venue

Bureaucracy as a Lens for Analyzing and Designing Algorithmic Systems

Juho Pääkkönen, Matti Nelimarkka, Jesse Haapoja, Airi Lampinen

2020Year
36Citations
8Top-tier citations

Abstract

Scholarship on algorithms has drawn on the analogy between algorithmic systems and bureaucracies to diagnose shortcom ings in algorithmic decision-making. We extend the analogy further by drawing on Michel Crozier's theory of bureaucratic organizations to analyze the relationship between algorithmic and human decision-making power. We present algorithms as analogous to impartial bureaucratic rules for controlling action, and argue that discretionary decision-making power in algorithmic systems accumulates at locations where un certainty about the operation of algorithms persists. This key point of our essay connects with Alkhatib and Bernstein's the ory of 'street-level algorithms', and highlights that the role of human discretion in algorithmic systems is to accommodate uncertain situations which inflexible algorithms cannot han dle. We conclude by discussing how the analysis and design of algorithmic systems could seek to identify and cultivate important sources of uncertainty, to enable the human discre tionary work that enhances systemic resilience in the face of algorithmic errors.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext d725ecb1-d3c6-4ff9-9a98-8c3c3674a473

Cited by top-tier papers8

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines