To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd Outcomes
Ali Alkhatib
Abstract
The promise AI's proponents have made for decades is one in which our needs are predicted, anticipated, and met -often before we even realize it. Instead, algorithmic systems, particularly AIs trained on large datasets and deployed to massive scales, seem to keep making the wrong decisions, causing harm and rewarding absurd outcomes. Attempts to make sense of why AIs make wrong calls in the moment explain the instances of errors, but how the environment surrounding these systems precipitate those instances remains murky. This paper draws from anthropological work on bureaucracies, states, and power, translating these ideas into a theory describing the structural tendency for powerful algorithmic systems to cause tremendous harm. I show how administrative models and projections of the world create marginalization, just as algorithmic models cause representational and allocative harm. This paper concludes with a recommendation to avoid the absurdity algorithmic systems produce by denying them power.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 697ca691-994f-41d2-9edb-f141c28827edCited by top-tier papers19
- Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision SupportAnna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton et al.CHI 2022 · 137 citations
- From Treatment to Healing: Envisioning a Decolonial Digital Mental HealthSachin R. Pendse, Daniel Nkemelu, Nicola J. Bidwell, Sushrut Jadhav et al.CHI 2022 · 113 citations
- How Knowledge Workers Think Generative AI Will (Not) Transform Their IndustriesAllison Woodruff, Renee Shelby, Patrick Gage Kelley, Steven Rousso-Schindler et al.CHI 2024 · 109 citations
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2022 · 96 citations
- Diffraction-in-action: Designerly Explorations of Agential Realism Through Lived DataPedro Sanches, Noura Howell, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Tom Jenkins et al.CHI 2022 · 84 citations
Builds on3
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Critical Race Theory for HCIIhudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D. R. Smith, Alexandra To, Kentaro ToyamaCHI 2020 · 397 citations
- Random, Messy, Funny, Raw: Finstas as Intimate Reconfigurations of Social MediaSijia Xiao, Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, Karrie Karahalios et al.CHI 2020 · 70 citations
Related papers
- Bureaucracy as a Lens for Analyzing and Designing Algorithmic SystemsJuho Pääkkönen, Matti Nelimarkka, Jesse Haapoja, Airi LampinenCHI 2020 · 36 citations
- Conceptualizing Algorithmic StigmatizationNazanin Andalibi, Cassidy Pyle, Kristen Barta, Lu Xian et al.CHI 2023 · 17 citations
- A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms in Homelessness ResearchErina Seh-Young Moon, Shion GuhaCHI 2024 · 10 citations
- A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms used within the U.S. Child Welfare SystemDevansh Saxena, Karla A. Badillo-Urquiola, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Shion GuhaCHI 2020 · 114 citations
- "We Would Never Write That Down": Classifications of Unemployed and Data Challenges for AIAnette C. M. Petersen, Lars Rune Christensen, Richard Harper, Thomas T. HildebrandtCSCW 2021 · 36 citations
