A hunt for the Snark: Annotator Diversity in Data Practices
Shivani Kapania, Alex S. Taylor, Ding Wang
Abstract
Diversity in datasets is a key component to building responsible AI/ML. Despite this recognition, we know little about the diversity among the annotators involved in data production. We investigated the approaches to annotator diversity through 16 semi-structured interviews and a survey with 44 AI/ML practitioners. While practitioners described nuanced understandings of annotator diversity, they rarely designed dataset production to account for diversity in the annotation process. The lack of action was explained through operational barriers: from the lack of visibility in the annotator hiring process, to the conceptual difficulty in incorporating worker diversity. We argue that such operational barriers and the widespread resistance to accommodating annotator diversity surface a prevailing logic in data practices-where neutrality, objectivity and 'representationalist thinking' dominate. By understanding this logic to be part of a regime of existence, we explore alternative ways of accounting for annotator subjectivity and diversity in data practices.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c3f65d76-488f-4624-b093-cfd50c48e3e7Cited by top-tier papers13
- FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation BenchmarkLaura Gustafson, Chloé Rolland, Nikhila Ravi, Quentin Duval et al.ICCV 2023 · 74 citations
- Everyday Uncertainty: How Blind People Use GenAI Tools for Information AccessXinru Tang, Ali Abdolrahmani, Darren Gergle, Anne Marie PiperCHI 2025 · 26 citations
- Making Data Work CountSrravya Chandhiramowuli, Alex S. Taylor, Sara Heitlinger, Ding WangCSCW 2024 · 25 citations
- Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on WikipediaTzu-Sheng Kuo, Aaron Lee Halfaker, Zirui Cheng, Jiwoo Kim et al.CHI 2024 · 19 citations
- Better Little People Pictures: Generative Creation of Demographically Diverse AnthropographicsPriya Dhawka, Lauren Perera, Wesley WillettCHI 2024 · 8 citations
Builds on15
- "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AINithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong et al.CHI 2021 · 725 citations
- On Measuring and Mitigating Biased Inferences of Word EmbeddingsSunipa Dev, Tao Li, Jeff M. Phillips, Vivek SrikumarAAAI 2020 · 195 citations
- Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer VisionMilagros Miceli, Martin Schuessler, Tianling YangCSCW 2020 · 148 citations
- Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning ModelsMitchell L. Gordon, Michelle S. Lam, Joon Sung Park, Kayur Patel et al.CHI 2022 · 134 citations
- The Landscape and Gaps in Open Source Fairness ToolkitsMichelle Seng Ah Lee, Jatinder SinghCHI 2021 · 117 citations
Related papers
- "It is currently hodgepodge": Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI ValuesRama Adithya Varanasi, Nitesh GoyalCHI 2023 · 52 citations
- Towards a Non-Ideal Methodological Framework for Responsible MLRamaravind Kommiya Mothilal, Shion Guha, Syed Ishtiaque AhmedCHI 2024 · 7 citations
- Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotationDing Wang, Shantanu Prabhat, Nithya SambasivanCHI 2022 · 66 citations
- Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and DesiderataAmy Heger, Liz B. Marquis, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Hanna M. Wallach et al.CSCW 2022 · 58 citations
- Documenting Data Production Processes: A Participatory Approach for Data WorkMilagros Miceli, Tianling Yang, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Julian Posada et al.CSCW 2022 · 28 citations
