Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors
Hong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth Holstein
Abstract
A growing body of literature has proposed formal approaches to audit algorithmic systems for biased and harmful behaviors. While formal auditing approaches have been greatly impactful, they often suffer major blindspots, with critical issues surfacing only in the context of everyday use once systems are deployed. Recent years have seen many cases in which everyday users of algorithmic systems detect and raise awareness about harmful behaviors that they encounter in the course of their everyday interactions with these systems. However, to date little academic attention has been granted to these bottom-up, user-driven auditing processes. In this paper, we propose and explore the concept of everyday algorithm auditing, a process in which users detect, understand, and interrogate problematic machine behaviors via their day-to-day interactions with algorithmic systems. We argue that everyday users are powerful in surfacing problematic machine behaviors that may elude detection via more centrally-organized forms of auditing, regardless of users' knowledge about the underlying algorithms. We analyze several real-world cases of everyday algorithm auditing, drawing lessons from these cases for the design of future platforms and tools that facilitate such auditing behaviors. Finally, we discuss work that lies ahead, toward bridging the gaps between formal auditing approaches and the organic auditing behaviors that emerge in everyday use of algorithmic systems.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Empirical studies in HCI .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers50
- Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision SupportAnna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton et al.CHI 2022 · 137 citations
- Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI EthicsRichmond Y. Wong, Michael A. Madaio, Nick MerrillCSCW 2023 · 108 citations
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2022 · 96 citations
- "Because AI is 100% right and safe": User Attitudes and Sources of AI Authority in IndiaShivani Kapania, Oliver Siy, Gabe Clapper, Azhagu Meena SP et al.CHI 2022 · 90 citations
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
Builds on8
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic ResistanceNadia Karizat, Daniel Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2021 · 338 citations
- The Landscape and Gaps in Open Source Fairness ToolkitsMichelle Seng Ah Lee, Jatinder SinghCHI 2021 · 117 citations
- Random, Messy, Funny, Raw: Finstas as Intimate Reconfigurations of Social MediaSijia Xiao, Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, Karrie Karahalios et al.CHI 2020 · 70 citations
- Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPSu Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, Hanna M. WallachACL 2020 · 68 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry PracticeWesley Hanwen Deng, Bill Boyuan Guo, Alicia DeVrio, Hong Shen et al.CHI 2023 · 73 citations
- Participation and Division of Labor in User-Driven Algorithm Audits: How Do Everyday Users Work together to Surface Algorithmic Harms?Rena Li, Sara Kingsley, Chelsea Fan, Proteeti Sinha et al.CHI 2023 · 28 citations
- WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AIWesley Hanwen Deng, Claire Wang, Howard Ziyu Han, Jason I. Hong et al.CSCW 2025 · 12 citations
- Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm AuditsJack BandyCSCW 2021 · 190 citations
- Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI ModelLuis Morales-Navarro, Michelle A. Gan, Evelyn Yu, Lauren Vogelstein et al.CSCW 2025 · 6 citations
