Fair Scratch Tickets: Finding Fair Sparse Networks without Weight Training
Pengwei Tang, Wei Yao, Zhicong Li, Yong Liu
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that computer vision models come at the risk of compromising fairness. There are extensive works to alleviate unfairness in computer vision using pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing methods. In this paper, we lead a novel fairness-aware learning paradigm for in-processing methods through the lens of the lottery ticket hypothesis (LTH) in the context of computer vision fairness. We randomly initialize a dense neural network and find appropriate binary masks for the weights to obtain a fair sparse subnetworks without any weight training. Interestingly, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to discover that such sparse subnetworks with inborn fairness exist in randomly initialized networks, achieving an accuracy-fairness trade-off comparable to that of dense neural networks trained with existing fairness-aware inprocessing approaches. We term these fair subnetworks as Fair Scratch Tickets (FSTs). We also theoretically provide fairness and accuracy guarantees for them. In our experiments, we investigate the existence of FSTs on various datasets, target attributes, random initialization methods, sparsity patterns, and fairness surrogates. We also find that FSTs can transfer across datasets and investigate other properties of FSTs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c1eade49-1e68-4aa7-a236-57504c769c39Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on30
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Balanced Datasets Are Not Enough: Estimating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Deep Image RepresentationsTianlu Wang, Jieyu Zhao, Mark Yatskar, Kai-Wei Chang et al.ICCV 2019 · 469 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT NetworksTianlong Chen, Jonathan Frankle, Shiyu Chang, Sijia Liu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 428 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
Related papers
- Drawing Robust Scratch Tickets: Subnetworks with Inborn Robustness Are Found within Randomly Initialized NetworksYonggan Fu, Qixuan Yu, Yang Zhang, Shang Wu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 36 citations
- Dual Lottery Ticket HypothesisYue Bai, Huan Wang, Zhiqiang Tao, Kunpeng Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Plant 'n' Seek: Can You Find the Winning Ticket?Jonas Fischer, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?Ning Liu, Geng Yuan, Zhengping Che, Xuan Shen et al.ICML 2021 · 34 citations
- Finding Meta Winning Ticket to Train Your MAMLDawei Gao, Yuexiang Xie, Zimu Zhou, Zhen Wang et al.KDD 2022 · 2 citations
