Improving Fairness and Privacy in Selection Problems
Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed Abroshan, Somayeh Sojoudi
Abstract
Supervised learning models have been increasingly used for making decisions about individuals in applications such as hiring, lending, and college admission. These models may inherit pre-existing biases from training datasets and discriminate against protected attributes (e.g., race or gender). In addition to unfairness, privacy concerns also arise when the use of models reveals sensitive personal information. Among various privacy notions, differential privacy has become popular in recent years. In this work, we study the possibility of using a differentially private exponential mechanism as a post-processing step to improve both fairness and privacy of supervised learning models. Unlike many existing works, we consider a scenario where a supervised model is used to select a limited number of applicants as the number of available positions is limited. This assumption is well-suited for various scenarios, such as job application and college admission. We use ``equal opportunity'' as the fairness notion and show that the exponential mechanisms can make the decision-making process perfectly fair. Moreover, the experiments on real-world datasets show that the exponential mechanism can improve both privacy and fairness, with a slight decrease in accuracy compared to the model without post-processing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 14fdff2e-91a9-4956-8210-81ae655aa419Cited by top-tier papers5
- Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization under the Fairness LensCuong Tran, My H. Dinh, Ferdinando FiorettoNeurIPS 2021 · 61 citations
- Fairness Interventions as (Dis)Incentives for Strategic ManipulationXueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Kun Jin, Parinaz Naghizadeh et al.ICML 2022 · 27 citations
- Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning ModelsMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed AbroshanNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
- Loss Balancing for Fair Supervised LearningMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed AbroshanICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Toward Fairness Without Harm from Vision to LVLMsXuwei Tan, Ziyu Hu, Xueru ZhangICLR 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on3
- Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected GroupsSerena Lutong Wang, Wenshuo Guo, Harikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 134 citations
- How do fair decisions fare in long-term qualification?Xueru Zhang, Ruibo Tu, Yang Liu, Mingyan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 87 citations
- Fair Learning with Private Demographic DataHussein Mozannar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Nathan SrebroICML 2020 · 85 citations
Related papers
- Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair LearningAndrew Lowy, Devansh Gupta, Meisam RazaviyaynICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair RegressionRuicheng Xian, Qiaobo Li, Gautam Kamath, Han ZhaoICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Differentially Private and Fair Classification via Calibrated Functional MechanismJiahao Ding, Xinyue Zhang, Xiaohuan Li, Junyi Wang et al.AAAI 2020 · 50 citations
- Group-Aware Threshold Adaptation for Fair ClassificationTaeuk Jang, Pengyi Shi, Xiaoqian WangAAAI 2022 · 49 citations
- Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual ApproachCuong Tran, Ferdinando Fioretto, Pascal Van HentenryckAAAI 2021 · 90 citations
