"This Is Damn Slick!" Estimating the Impact of Tweets on Open Source Project Popularity and New Contributors
Hongbo Fang, Hemank Lamba, James D. Herbsleb, Bogdan Vasilescu
Abstract
Twitter is widely used by software developers. But how effective are tweets at promoting open source projects? How could one use Twitter to increase a project's popularity or attract new contributors? In this paper we report on a mixed-methods empirical study of 44,544 tweets containing links to 2,370 open-source GitHub repositories, looking for evidence of causal effects of these tweets on the projects attracting new GitHub stars and contributors, as well as characterizing the high-impact tweets, the people likely being attracted by them, and how they differ from contributors attracted otherwise. Among others, we find that tweets have a statistically significant and practically sizable effect on obtaining new stars and a small average effect on attracting new contributors. The popularity, content of the tweet, as well as the identity of tweet authors all affect the scale of the attraction effect. In addition, our qualitative analysis suggests that forming an active Twitter community for an open source project plays an important role in attracting new committers via tweets. We also report that developers who are new to GitHub or have a long history of Twitter usage but few tweets posted are most likely to be attracted as contributors to the repositories mentioned by tweets. Our work contributes to the literature on open source sustainability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f1577fae-9915-4dad-9cd9-408296689c68Cited by top-tier papers3
- "We Feel Like We're Winging It: " A Study on Navigating Open-Source Dependency AbandonmentCourtney Miller, Christian Kästner, Bogdan VasilescuFSE 2023 · 19 citations
- The Dilemma of Building Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Solutions For Workplace AccessibilityYoonha Cha, Victoria Jackson, Karina Kohl, Rafael Prikladnicki et al.CHI 2025 · 12 citations
- "My GitHub Sponsors profile is live!" Investigating the Impact of Twitter/X Mentions on GitHub SponsorsYoumei Fan, Tao Xiao, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude et al.ICSE 2024 · 4 citations
Builds on5
- How to not get rich: an empirical study of donations in open sourceCassandra Overney, Jens Meinicke, Christian Kästner, Bogdan VasilescuICSE 2020 · 34 citations
- How Gamification Affects Software Developers: Cautionary Evidence from a Natural Experiment on GitHubLukas Moldon, Markus Strohmaier, Johannes WachsICSE 2021 · 26 citations
- Herding a Deluge of Good Samaritans: How GitHub Projects Respond to Increased AttentionDanaja Maldeniya, Ceren Budak, Lionel P. Robert Jr., Daniel M. RomeroWWW 2020 · 24 citations
- Understanding the impact of GitHub suggested changes on recommendations between developersChris Brown, Chris ParninFSE 2020 · 18 citations
- Deep Exogenous and Endogenous Influence Combination for Social Chatter Intensity PredictionSubhabrata Dutta, Sarah Masud, Soumen Chakrabarti, Tanmoy ChakrabortyKDD 2020 · 2 citations
Related papers
- How Does Core Contributor Disengagement Impact Open Source Project Activity? A Quasi-ExperimentYunqi Chen, Klaas-Jan Stol, Fabio Santos, Daniel M German et al.ICSE 2026
- GitHub Sponsors: Exploring a New Way to Contribute to Open SourceNaomichi Shimada, Tao Xiao, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude et al.ICSE 2022 · 10 citations
- Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github's Sponsor MechanismXunhui Zhang, Tao Wang, Yue Yu, Qiubing Zeng et al.CHI 2022 · 11 citations
- The Landscape of Toxicity: An Empirical Investigation of Toxicity on GitHubJaydeb Sarker, Asif Kamal Turzo, Amiangshu BosuFSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Contribution Patterns in Open Source Software for Social Good: Dynamics, Individuals, and Impact CSCW010Zihan Fang, Yueke Zhang, Thomas Zimmermann, Denae Ford et al.CSCW 2026 · 2 citations
