How to not get rich: an empirical study of donations in open source
Cassandra Overney, Jens Meinicke, Christian Kästner, Bogdan Vasilescu
Abstract
Open source is ubiquitous and many projects act as critical infrastructure, yet funding and sustaining the whole ecosystem is challenging. While there are many different funding models for open source and concerted efforts through foundations, donation platforms like PayPal, Patreon, and OpenCollective are popular and low-bar platforms to raise funds for open-source development. With a mixed-method study, we investigate the emerging and largely unexplored phenomenon of donations in open source. Specifically, we quantify how commonly open-source projects ask for donations, statistically model characteristics of projects that ask for and receive donations, analyze for what the requested funds are needed and used, and assess whether the received donations achieve the intended outcomes. We find 25,885 projects asking for donations on GitHub, often to support engineering activities; however, we also find no clear evidence that donations influence the activity level of a project. In fact, we find that donations are used in a multitude of ways, raising new research questions about effective funding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ccba1ba1-143c-482c-9010-c4bfa4d2f752Cited by top-tier papers10
- Committed to Trust: A Qualitative Study on Security & Trust in Open Source Software ProjectsDominik Wermke, Noah Wöhler, Jan H. Klemmer, Marcel Fourné et al.S&P 2022 · 54 citations
- Leaving My Fingerprints: Motivations and Challenges of Contributing to OSS for Social GoodYu Huang, Denae Ford, Thomas ZimmermannICSE 2021 · 36 citations
- "This Is Damn Slick!" Estimating the Impact of Tweets on Open Source Project Popularity and New ContributorsHongbo Fang, Hemank Lamba, James D. Herbsleb, Bogdan VasilescuICSE 2022 · 18 citations
- Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github's Sponsor MechanismXunhui Zhang, Tao Wang, Yue Yu, Qiubing Zeng et al.CHI 2022 · 11 citations
- How Are Paid and Volunteer Open Source Developers Different? A Study of the Rust ProjectYuxia Zhang, Mian Qin, Klaas-Jan Stol, Minghui Zhou et al.ICSE 2024 · 10 citations
Related papers
- GitHub Sponsors: Exploring a New Way to Contribute to Open SourceNaomichi Shimada, Tao Xiao, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude et al.ICSE 2022 · 10 citations
- "My GitHub Sponsors profile is live!" Investigating the Impact of Twitter/X Mentions on GitHub SponsorsYoumei Fan, Tao Xiao, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude et al.ICSE 2024 · 4 citations
- Understanding skills for OSS communities on GitHubJenny T. Liang, Thomas Zimmermann, Denae FordFSE 2022 · 31 citations
- "Did You Miss My Comment or What?" Understanding Toxicity in Open Source DiscussionsCourtney Miller, Sophie Cohen, Daniel Klug, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.ICSE 2022 · 54 citations
- A Multi-platform Study of Crowd Signals Associated with Successful Online FundraisingHenry K. Dambanemuya, Emoke-Ágnes HorvátCSCW 2021 · 10 citations
