How Gamification Affects Software Developers: Cautionary Evidence from a Natural Experiment on GitHub
Lukas Moldon, Markus Strohmaier, Johannes Wachs
Abstract
We examine how the behavior of software developers changes in response to removing gamification elements from GitHub, an online platform for collaborative programming and software development. We find that the unannounced removal of daily activity streak counters from the user interface (from user profile pages) was followed by significant changes in behavior. Long-running streaks of activity were abandoned and became less common. Weekend activity decreased and days in which developers made a single contribution became less common. Synchronization of streaking behavior in the platform's social network also decreased, suggesting that gamification is a powerful channel for social influence. Focusing on a set of software developers that were publicly pursuing a goal to make contributions for 100 days in a row, we find that some of these developers abandon this quest following the removal of the public streak counter. Our findings provide evidence for the significant impact of gamification on the behavior of developers on large collaborative programming and software development platforms. They urge caution: gamification can steer the behavior of software developers in unexpected and unwanted directions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2bf4dcd8-690f-4385-805f-9ab654f46edbCited by top-tier papers5
- Committed to Trust: A Qualitative Study on Security & Trust in Open Source Software ProjectsDominik Wermke, Noah Wöhler, Jan H. Klemmer, Marcel Fourné et al.S&P 2022 · 54 citations
- Sensible and Sensitive AI for Worker Wellbeing: Factors that Inform Adoption and Resistance for Information WorkersVedant Das Swain, Lan Gao, Abhirup Mondal, Gregory D. Abowd et al.CHI 2024 · 22 citations
- "This Is Damn Slick!" Estimating the Impact of Tweets on Open Source Project Popularity and New ContributorsHongbo Fang, Hemank Lamba, James D. Herbsleb, Bogdan VasilescuICSE 2022 · 18 citations
- It's like flossing your teeth: On the Importance and Challenges of Reproducible Builds for Software Supply Chain SecurityMarcel Fourné, Dominik Wermke, William Enck, Sascha Fahl et al.S&P 2023
- A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security FeaturesJessy Ayala, Yu-Jye Tung, Joshua GarciaUSENIX Security 2025
Related papers
- Relative Feedback Increases Disparities in Effort and Performance in Crowdsourcing Contests: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment on TopcoderMilena Tsvetkova, Sebastian Müller, Oana Vuculescu, Haylee Ham et al.CSCW 2022 · 8 citations
- Herding a Deluge of Good Samaritans: How GitHub Projects Respond to Increased AttentionDanaja Maldeniya, Ceren Budak, Lionel P. Robert Jr., Daniel M. RomeroWWW 2020 · 24 citations
- Understanding the impact of GitHub suggested changes on recommendations between developersChris Brown, Chris ParninFSE 2020 · 18 citations
- How Does Core Contributor Disengagement Impact Open Source Project Activity? A Quasi-ExperimentYunqi Chen, Klaas-Jan Stol, Fabio Santos, Daniel M German et al.ICSE 2026
- Big Data = Big Insights? Operationalising Brooks' Law in a Massive GitHub Data SetChristoph Gote, Pavlin Mavrodiev, Frank Schweitzer, Ingo ScholtesICSE 2022 · 4 citations
