Understanding the impact of GitHub suggested changes on recommendations between developers
Chris Brown, Chris Parnin
Abstract
Recommendations between colleagues are effective for encouraging developers to adopt better practices. Research shows these peer interactions are useful for improving developer behaviors, or the adoption of activities to help software engineers complete programming tasks. However, in-person recommendations between developers in the workplace are declining. One form of online recommendations between developers are pull requests, which allow users to propose code changes and provide feedback on contributions. GitHub, a popular code hosting platform, recently introduced the suggested changes feature, which allows users to recommend improvements for pull requests. To better understand this feature and its impact on recommendations between developers, we report an empirical study of this system, measuring usage, effectiveness, and perception. Our results show that suggested changes support code review activities and significantly impact the timing and communication between developers on pull requests. This work provides insight into the suggested changes feature and implications for improving future systems for automated developer recommendations, such as providing situated, concise, and actionable feedback.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 690c108a-70ab-4ffb-9028-446bf96cf4c2Cited by top-tier papers2
- "This Is Damn Slick!" Estimating the Impact of Tweets on Open Source Project Popularity and New ContributorsHongbo Fang, Hemank Lamba, James D. Herbsleb, Bogdan VasilescuICSE 2022 · 18 citations
- Opportunities and Challenges in Repeated Revisions to Pull-Requests: An Empirical StudyZhixing Li, Yue Yu, Tao Wang, Shanshan Li et al.CSCW 2022 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Autonomy Is An Acquired Taste: Exploring Developer Preferences for GitHub BotsAmir Ghorbani, Nathan Cassee, Derek Robinson, Adam Alami et al.ICSE 2023 · 8 citations
- The Effectiveness of Security Interventions on GitHubFelix Fischer, Jonas Höbenreich, Jens GrossklagsCCS 2023 · 4 citations
- "@alex, this fixes #9": Analysis of Referencing Patterns in Pull Request DiscussionsAshish Chopra, Morgan Mo, Samuel Dodson, Ivan Beschastnikh et al.CSCW 2021 · 13 citations
- A case study of implicit mentoring, its prevalence, and impact in ApacheZixuan Feng, Amreeta Chatterjee, Anita Sarma, Iftekhar AhmedFSE 2022 · 17 citations
- Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer InterventionsTao Xiao, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude, Kenichi MatsumotoFSE 2024 · 13 citations
