The Effectiveness of Security Interventions on GitHub
Felix Fischer, Jonas Höbenreich, Jens Grossklags
Abstract
In 2017, GitHub was the first online open source platform to show security alerts to its users. It has since introduced further security interventions to help developers improve the security of their open source software. In this study, we investigate and compare the effects of these interventions. This offers a valuable empirical perspective on security interventions in the context of software development, enriching the predominantly qualitative and surveybased literature landscape with substantial data-driven insights. We conduct a time series analysis on security-altering commits covering the entire history of a large-scale sample of over 50,000 GitHub repositories to infer the causal effects of the security alert, security update, and code scanning interventions. Our analysis shows that while all of GitHub's security interventions have a significant positive effect on security, they differ greatly in their effect size. By comparing the design of each intervention, we identify the building blocks that worked well and those that did not. We also provide recommendations on how practitioners can improve the design of their interventions to enhance their effectiveness. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Usability in security and privacy; Software security engineering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d5343943-e6f5-4bfe-a361-a2a83de4de5dCited by top-tier papers2
- Everyone for Themselves? A Qualitative Study about Individual Security Setups of Open Source Software ContributorsSabrina Amft, Sandra Höltervennhoff, Rebecca Panskus, Karola Marky et al.S&P 2024 · 21 citations
- A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security FeaturesJessy Ayala, Yu-Jye Tung, Joshua GarciaUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on9
- Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code ContributionsHammond Pearce, Baleegh Ahmad, Benjamin Tan, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt et al.S&P 2022 · 725 citations
- You Get Where You're Looking for: The Impact of Information Sources on Code SecurityYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Doowon Kim et al.S&P 2016 · 325 citations
- Stack Overflow Considered Harmful? The Impact of Copy&Paste on Android Application SecurityFelix Fischer, Konstantin Böttinger, Huang Xiao, Christian Stransky et al.S&P 2017 · 293 citations
- Comparing the Usability of Cryptographic APIsYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Simson L. Garfinkel et al.S&P 2017 · 261 citations
- InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and SynthesisDaniel Fried, Armen Aghajanyan, Jessy Lin, Sida Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 140 citations
Related papers
- Action Required: A Mixed-Methods Study of Security Practices in GitHub ActionsYusuke Kubo, Fumihiro Kanei, Mitsuaki Akiyama, Takuro Wakai et al.NDSS 2026 · 3 citations
- A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Security PatchesFrank Li, Vern PaxsonCCS 2017 · 273 citations
- Understanding the impact of GitHub suggested changes on recommendations between developersChris Brown, Chris ParninFSE 2020 · 18 citations
- "This Is Damn Slick!" Estimating the Impact of Tweets on Open Source Project Popularity and New ContributorsHongbo Fang, Hemank Lamba, James D. Herbsleb, Bogdan VasilescuICSE 2022 · 18 citations
- Who's Pushing the Code? An Exploration of GitHub ImpersonationYueke Zhang, Anda Liang, Xiaohan Wang, Pamela J. Wisniewski et al.ICSE 2025 · 2 citations
