USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security Features
Jessy Ayala, Yu-Jye Tung, Joshua Garcia
Abstract
In open-source software (OSS), software vulnerabilities have significantly increased. Although researchers have investigated the perspectives of vulnerability reporters and OSS contributor security practices, understanding the perspectives of OSS maintainers on vulnerability management and platform security features is currently understudied. In this paper, we investigate the perspectives of OSS maintainers who maintain projects listed in the GitHub Advisory Database. We explore this area by conducting two studies: identifying aspects through a listing survey () and gathering insights from semi-structured interviews (). Of the 37 identified aspects, we find that supply chain mistrust and lack of automation for vulnerability management are the most challenging, and barriers to adopting platform security features include a lack of awareness and the perception that they are not necessary. Surprisingly, we find that despite being previously vulnerable, some maintainers still allow public vulnerability reporting, or ignore reports altogether. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for OSS platforms and how the research community can better support OSS vulnerability management efforts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Action Required: A Mixed-Methods Study of Security Practices in GitHub ActionsYusuke Kubo, Fumihiro Kanei, Mitsuaki Akiyama, Takuro Wakai et al.NDSS 2026 · 3 citations
- Credible Threat Detection? Measuring Contribution Dynamics and Quality Control in a Crowdsourced Threat Detection EcosystemApurva Virkud, Gang Wang, Adam BatesUSENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on20
- A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Security PatchesFrank Li, Vern PaxsonCCS 2017 · 273 citations
- Large Language Models Meet NL2Code: A SurveyDaoguang Zan, Bei Chen, Fengji Zhang, Dianjie Lu et al.ACL 2023 · 104 citations
- An Empirical Study on Software Bill of Materials: Where We Stand and the Road AheadBoming Xia, Tingting Bi, Zhenchang Xing, Qinghua Lu et al.ICSE 2023 · 82 citations
- "Did You Miss My Comment or What?" Understanding Toxicity in Open Source DiscussionsCourtney Miller, Sophie Cohen, Daniel Klug, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.ICSE 2022 · 54 citations
- Committed to Trust: A Qualitative Study on Security & Trust in Open Source Software ProjectsDominik Wermke, Noah Wöhler, Jan H. Klemmer, Marcel Fourné et al.S&P 2022 · 54 citations
Related papers
- A Deep Dive into How Open-Source Project Maintainers Review and Resolve Bug Bounty ReportsJessy Ayala, Steven Ngo, Joshua GarciaS&P 2025
- Between Risk, Recognition, and Necessity: How Open-Source Project Maintainers Perceive and Navigate CVEs Through Reporting and Resolving VulnerabilitiesJessy Ayala, Steven Ngo, Joshua GarciaCCS 2026
- "Threat modeling is very formal, it's very technical, and also very hard to do correctly": Investigating Threat Modeling Practices in Open-Source Software ProjectsHarjot Kaur, Carson Powers, Ronald E. Thompson III, Sascha Fahl et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Vision: Identifying Affected Library Versions for Open Source Software VulnerabilitiesSusheng Wu, Ruisi Wang, Kaifeng Huang, Yiheng Cao et al.ASE 2024 · 1 citation
- Death Is Not the End: a Longitudinal Study on the Impact of Automatic Updates on Container Vulnerability LifespansSimge Tekin, Octavian Suciu, Sungsu Kwag, Yonghwi Kwon et al.S&P 2026 · 1 citation
