Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
Tao Xiao, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude, Kenichi Matsumoto
Abstract
GitHub’s Copilot for Pull Requests (PRs) is a promising service aiming to automate various developer tasks related to PRs, such as generating summaries of changes or providing complete walkthroughs with links to the relevant code. As this innovative technology gains traction in the Open Source Software (OSS) community, it is crucial to examine its early adoption and its impact on the development process. Additionally, it offers a unique opportunity to observe how developers respond when they disagree with the generated content. In our study, we employ a mixed-methods approach, blending quantitative analysis with qualitative insights, to examine 18,256 PRs in which parts of the descriptions were crafted by generative AI. Our findings indicate that: (1) Copilot for PRs, though in its infancy, is seeing a marked uptick in adoption. (2) PRs enhanced by Copilot for PRs require less review time and have a higher likelihood of being merged. (3) Developers using Copilot for PRs often complement the automated descriptions with their manual input. These results offer valuable insights into the growing integration of generative AI in software development.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 11ae70c6-d239-47b5-bef1-7bcc24f89077Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Yuxiang Wei, Lingming ZhangICSE 2023 · 321 citations
- An extensive study on pre-trained models for program understanding and generationZhengran Zeng, Hanzhuo Tan, Haotian Zhang, Jing Li et al.ISSTA 2022 · 142 citations
Related papers
- "My productivity is boosted, but ..." Demystifying Users' Perception on AI Coding AssistantsYunbo Lyu, Zhou Yang, Jieke Shi, Jianming Chang et al.ASE 2025 · 8 citations
- A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and ChallengesJenny T. Liang, Chenyang Yang, Brad A. MyersICSE 2024 · 126 citations
- An Empirical Study of Knowledge Transfer in AI Pair ProgrammingAlisa Welter, Niklas Schneider, Tobias Dick, Kallistos Weis et al.ASE 2025
- Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer WorkflowsValerie Chen, Ameet Talwalkar, Robert Brennan, Graham NeubigCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Using AI Assistants in Software Development: A Qualitative Study on Security Practices and ConcernsJan H. Klemmer, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Nikhil Patnaik, Cordelia Ludden et al.CCS 2024 · 14 citations
