XDAC: XAI-Driven Detection and Attribution of LLM-Generated News Comments in Korean
Wooyoung Go, Hyoungshick Kim, Alice Oh, Yongdae Kim
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) generate human-like text, raising concerns about their misuse in creating deceptive content. Detecting LLM-generated comments (LGC) in online news is essential for preserving online discourse integrity and preventing opinion manipulation. However, effective detection faces two key challenges: the brevity and informality of news comments limit traditional detection methods, while the lack of publicly available LGC datasets hinders model development, particularly for non-English languages. To address these challenges, we propose a twofold approach. First, we develop an LGC generation framework to construct a high-quality dataset with diverse and complex examples. Second, we introduce XDAC (XAI-Driven Detection and Attribution of LLM-Generated Comments), a framework utilizing explainable AI, designed for the detection and attribution of short-form LGC in Korean news articles. XDAC leverages XAI to uncover distinguishing linguistic patterns at both token and character levels. We present the first large-scale benchmark dataset, comprising 1.3M human-written comments from Korean news platforms and 1M LLM-generated comments from 14 distinct models. XDAC outperforms existing methods, achieving a 98.5% F1 score in LGC detection with a relative improvement of 68.1%, and an 84.3% F1 score in attribution. To validate real-world applicability, we analyze 5.24M news comments from Naver, South Korea's leading online news platform, identifying 27,029 potential LLM-generated comments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dfb7b172-8c42-4cdd-a866-dae6be174ceaBuilds on11
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
- Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextAbhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi et al.ICML 2024 · 262 citations
- Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data HidingSahar Abdelnabi, Mario FritzS&P 2021 · 210 citations
- MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text DetectionXinlei He, Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes et al.CCS 2024 · 30 citations
Related papers
- DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT WordsmithKavita Kumari, Alessandro Pegoraro, Hossein Fereidooni, Ahmad-Reza SadeghiNDSS 2024
- KatFishNet: Detecting LLM-Generated Korean Text through Linguistic Feature AnalysisShinwoo Park, Shubin Kim, Do-Kyung Kim, Yo-Sub HanACL 2025 · 6 citations
- LLMs Killed Q&A Stars? Analyzing the Impact of LLM-Generated Answers on an Online Q&A PlatformDongwon Shin, Sooel SonWWW 2026
- Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement MeasurementZihao Cheng, Li Zhou, Feng Jiang, Benyou Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 20 citations
- Can AI-Generated Persuasion Be Detected? Persuaficial Benchmark and AI vs. Human Linguistic DifferencesArkadiusz Modzelewski, Pawel Golik, Anna Kolos, Giovanni Da San MartinoACL 2026 · 1 citation
