Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement
Zihao Cheng, Li Zhou, Feng Jiang, Benyou Wang, Haizhou Li
Abstract
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, has resulted in the widespread presence of LLM-generated content on social media platforms, raising concerns about misinformation, data biases, and privacy violations, which can undermine trust in online discourse. While detecting LLM-generated content is crucial for mitigating these risks, current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration. To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content. This approach introduces two novel tasks: LLM Role Recognition (LLM-RR), a multi-class classification task that identifies specific roles of an LLM in content generation, and LLM Involvement Measurement (LLM-IM), a regression task that quantifies the extent of LLM involvement in content creation. To support these tasks, we propose LLMDetect, a benchmark designed to evaluate detectors' performance on these new tasks. LLMDetect includes the Hybrid News Detection Corpus (HNDC) for training detectors, as well as DetectEval, a comprehensive evaluation suite that considers five distinct cross-context variations and two multi-intensity variations within the same LLM role. This allows for a thorough assessment of detectors' generalization and robustness across diverse contexts. Our empirical validation of 10 baseline detection methods demonstrates that fine-tuned Pre-trained Language Model (PLM)-based models consistently outperform others on both tasks, while advanced LLMs face challenges in accurately detecting their own generated content. Our experimental results and analysis offer insights for developing more effective detection models for LLM-generated content. This research enhances the understanding of LLM-generated content and establishes a foundation for more nuanced detection methodologies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 58d82c51-ee41-484f-8589-562224d83be4Cited by top-tier papers4
- Know You First and Be You Better: Modeling Human-Like User Simulators via Implicit ProfilesKuang Wang, Xianfei Li, Shenghao Yang, Li Zhou et al.ACL 2025 · 24 citations
- DETree: DEtecting Human-AI Collaborative Texts via Tree-Structured Hierarchical Representation LearningYongxin He, Shan Zhang, Yixuan Cao, Lei Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- CoCoNUTS: Concentrating on Content while Neglecting Uninformative Textual Styles for AI-Generated Peer Review DetectionYihan Chen, Jiawei Chen, Guozhao Mo, Xuanang Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- IACW: Intent-Aware Controllable Watermarking for Scalable Authorial Intent AttributionHao Huang, Ruihua Zhou, JiaTang Luo, Yunpeng Li et al.ICML 2026
Builds on13
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- Authorship Attribution for Neural Text GenerationAdaku Uchendu, Thai Le, Kai Shu, Dongwon LeeEMNLP 2020 · 110 citations
- No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design ChoicesQi Pang, Shengyuan Hu, Wenting Zheng, Virginia SmithNeurIPS 2024 · 56 citations
Related papers
- M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text DetectionYuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su et al.ACL 2024
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT WordsmithKavita Kumari, Alessandro Pegoraro, Hossein Fereidooni, Ahmad-Reza SadeghiNDSS 2024
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
- MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text DetectionXinlei He, Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes et al.CCS 2024 · 30 citations
