Lune

EMNLP Findings2024

On the Generalization of Training-based ChatGPT Detection Methods

Han Xu, Jie Ren, Pengfei He, Shenglai Zeng, Yingqian Cui, Amy Liu, Hui Liu, Jiliang Tang

Abstract

Large language models, such as ChatGPT, achieve amazing performance on various language processing tasks. However, they can also be exploited for improper purposes such as plagiarism or misinformation dissemination. Thus, there is an urgent need to detect the texts generated by LLMs. One type of most studied methods trains classification models to distinguish LLM texts from human texts. However, existing studies demonstrate the trained models may suffer from distribution shifts (during test), i.e., they are ineffective to predict the generated texts from unseen language tasks or topics which are not collected during training. In this work, we focus on ChatGPT as a representative model, and we conduct a comprehensive investigation on these methods' generalization behaviors under distribution shift caused by a wide range of factors, including prompts, text lengths, topics, and language tasks. To achieve this goal, we first collect a new dataset with human and ChatGPT texts, and then we conduct extensive studies on the collected dataset. Our studies unveil insightful findings that provide guidance for future methodologies and data collection strategies for LLM detection.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers4

  1. RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text DetectorsLiam Dugan, Alyssa Hwang, Filip Trhlík, Andrew Zhu et al.ACL 2024 · 18 citations
  2. DeCo-DETR: Decoupled Cognition DETR for efficient Open-Vocabulary Object DetectionSiheng Wang, Yanshu Li, Bohan Hu, Zhengdao Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
  3. Who Writes What: Unveiling the Impact of Author Roles on AI-generated Text DetectionJiatao Li, Xiaojun WanACL 2025
  4. LLM-Generated Text May Harm Your Retrieval! A Robust Detection Strategy for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationZhaoheng Huang, Yutao Zhu, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhicheng DouACL 2026

Builds on7

  1. DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
  2. A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
  3. MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence FrontiersKrishna Pillutla, Swabha Swayamdipta, Rowan Zellers, John Thickstun et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 606 citations
  4. DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated TextXianjun Yang, Wei Cheng, Yue Wu, Linda Ruth Petzold et al.ICLR 2024 · 173 citations
  5. Is Stack Overflow Obsolete? An Empirical Study of the Characteristics of ChatGPT Answers to Stack Overflow QuestionsSamia Kabir, David N. Udo-Imeh, Bonan Kou, Tianyi ZhangCHI 2024 · 149 citations

Related papers

  1. MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
  2. DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT WordsmithKavita Kumari, Alessandro Pegoraro, Hossein Fereidooni, Ahmad-Reza SadeghiNDSS 2024
  3. Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
  4. DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextJinyan Su, Terry Yue Zhuo, Di Wang, Preslav NakovEMNLP Findings 2023 · 80 citations
  5. Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement MeasurementZihao Cheng, Li Zhou, Feng Jiang, Benyou Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 20 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines