DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Text
Xianjun Yang, Wei Cheng, Yue Wu, Linda Ruth Petzold, William Yang Wang, Haifeng Chen
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have notably enhanced the fluency and diversity of machine-generated text. However, this progress also presents a significant challenge in detecting the origin of a given text, and current research on detection methods lags behind the rapid evolution of LLMs. Conventional training-based methods have limitations in flexibility, particularly when adapting to new domains, and they often lack explanatory power. To address this gap, we propose a novel training-free detection strategy called Divergent N-Gram Analysis (DNA-GPT). Given a text, we first truncate it in the middle and then use only the preceding portion as input to the LLMs to regenerate the new remaining parts. By analyzing the differences between the original and new remaining parts through N-gram analysis in black-box or probability divergence in white-box, we unveil significant discrepancies between the distribution of machine-generated text and the distribution of human-written text. We conducted extensive experiments on the most advanced LLMs from OpenAI, including text-davinci-003, GPT-3.5-turbo, and GPT-4, as well as open-source models such as GPT-NeoX-20B and LLaMa-13B. Results show that our zero-shot approach exhibits state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing between human and GPT-generated text on four English and one German dataset, outperforming OpenAI's own classifier, which is trained on millions of text. Additionally, our methods provide reasonable explanations and evidence to support our claim, which is a unique feature of explainable detection. Our method is also robust under the revised text attack and can additionally solve model sourcing. Codes are available at https://github.com/Xianjun-Yang/DNA-GPT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 604e5151-b38d-42f6-a5cb-1e163456d879Cited by top-tier papers52
- Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
- Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextAbhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi et al.ICML 2024 · 262 citations
- Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer ReviewsWeixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, Haley Lepp et al.ICML 2024 · 213 citations
- BiScope: AI-generated Text Detection by Checking Memorization of Preceding TokensHanxi Guo, Siyuan Cheng, Xiaolong Jin, Zhuo Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 52 citations
- Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code GenerationTaehyun Lee, Seokhee Hong, Jaewoo Ahn, Ilgee Hong et al.ACL 2024 · 36 citations
Builds on10
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
Related papers
- DNA-DetectLLM: Unveiling AI-Generated Text via a DNA-Inspired Mutation-Repair ParadigmXiaowei Zhu, Yubing Ren, Fang Fang, Qingfeng Tan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- DALD: Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMsCong Zeng, Shengkun Tang, Xianjun Yang, Yuanzhou Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024
- Learning to Rewrite: Generalized LLM-Generated Text DetectionWei Hao, Ran Li, Weiliang Zhao, Junfeng Yang et al.ACL 2025
- DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT WordsmithKavita Kumari, Alessandro Pegoraro, Hossein Fereidooni, Ahmad-Reza SadeghiNDSS 2024
- Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability SequencesYihuai Xu, Yongwei Wang, Yifei Bi, Huangsen Cao et al.ICLR 2025
